06.04.2013 Views

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SPORES HYALINE.<br />

3RD GENERAL DIVISION, AURANTIACUS.<br />

Fomes with "red" context have been variously designated as latericeous or in<br />

Saccardo as ruber. I think they all have an orange shade. They match in Ridgway<br />

with orange rufous or Sanford brown. No species occurs in Europe, and but one<br />

rarely in the United States. They are mostly tropical.<br />

SECTION 65. CONTEXT ORANGE RUFOUS. SPORES HYALINE<br />

(OR VERY PALE COLORED).<br />

FOMES KERMES. Pileus thin, applanate, with a dull orange<br />

surface, but no distinct crust. Usually the plant is largely resupinate<br />

with a slightly reflexed pileus. Context bright, latericeous (I should call<br />

it), but it matches Ridgway 's orange rufous. Pores minute, round,<br />

at first (apparently) white, but soon become concolorous with the<br />

context. Spores not found, but undoubtedly white.<br />

This is the most frequent red species that occurs in the East.<br />

Quantities of it have been distributed lately from the Philippines<br />

under the absurd name Fomes albo-marginatus. It is found also at<br />

Kew as Polyporus laeticolor from Philippines, Fomes kermes (the<br />

best name) from Ceylon, Fomes pyrrhocreas from Australia, and at<br />

Berlin as Fomes ochrocroceus from Java. It does not occur in the<br />

American tropics.<br />

Compare laeticolor, albo-marginatus, ochrocroceus, pyrrhocreas.<br />

FOMES (?) LAETUS. Pileus thin, apparently fleshy. Spores globose,<br />

white, smooth, 5-6 mic.<br />

It is the same colored context and is probably the same plant as Fomes kermes.<br />

Still there is no evidence that the type is a "Fomes," and it is thinner, more fleshy,<br />

and from this one collection should be classed as Polyporus. If it is a Polyporus,<br />

however, there is nothing to indicate that it is a Merisma, as classed.<br />

FOMES PERLEVIS. Pileus ungulate, (type specimen 6 x 10<br />

inches). Surface dark fawn, with no distinct crust, soft, easily indented.<br />

Context orange rufous, soft. Pores in distinct layers, medium,<br />

round, the tissue concolorous, but the mouths and hymenial<br />

layer pale or white. Spores abundant, mostly 4-4>^ x 5^-6 hyaline,<br />

a few (probably the ripe ones) 6-7 x 7^4.<br />

This is remarkable in its light weight and soft texture, but notwithstanding<br />

it is a true Fomes. The context is orange red, but the<br />

pale pores and light surface give no indication of it in an uncut specimen.<br />

I have received several collections from Henri Perrier de la<br />

Bathie, Madagascar. It is unknown otherwise.<br />

Poria fulvo-umbrinus. This, as far as known, is a resupinate Fomes from<br />

Brazil, with orange rufous context and elliptical, subhyaline or pale colored spores<br />

4x7 mic. It is the only similar plant known from the American tropics. The<br />

color of context is exactly the same as that of Fomes tricolor, but why called "yellow<br />

umber" when it is orange red?<br />

231

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!