06.04.2013 Views

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

Lloyd Mycological Writings V4.pdf - MykoWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section Tabacinus.<br />

Polystictus tabacinus.<br />

NOTE 108. As we get this plant from various localities, we are becoming convinced<br />

that it is not practical to distinguish Polystictus tabacinus from Polystictus iodinus.<br />

We have exactly same plant in our Southern States.<br />

Fomes hornodermus.<br />

Fomes perlevis.<br />

FOMES.<br />

Context color white.<br />

Context color rose or latericeous.<br />

(cfr. Letter No. 39.) Mr. Henri Perrier de la Bathie sends this in abundance.<br />

How this most peculiar species escaped being named until such a late date is a mystery.<br />

Fomes nontostus (Bresadola's determination as Fomes semitostus).<br />

I have compared these with the type at Kew and find it has same pores and context<br />

color and texture, but the surface is different. In the type it is smooth, reddish brown,<br />

and the name "half scorched" is not bad. In these specimens from Madagascar there<br />

is no indication of this. The pale, sulcate surface is better called "nontostus." The type<br />

of Fomes semitostus has practically no context. It is well developed in these specimens,<br />

soft, punky, pinkish cinnamon.<br />

Fomes sculpturatus.<br />

Context pale, pores darker.<br />

Since this plant has been named, we conclude that it is practically the same<br />

species as Fomes mirabilis from Malay. The spores are very different. Globose, brown,<br />

7-8 mic. smooth, punctate in Fomes mirabilis ; large, 14 x 20 mic. ovate, brown in Fomes<br />

sculpturatus. We think perhaps that Fomes sculpturatus is the conidial spored form of the<br />

Malay plant. It is curious, however, that in an ample sending from Henri Perrier de la<br />

Bathie all had these same large spores.<br />

Context color brown, ferruginous or fulvous.<br />

Fomes senex.<br />

A frequent species in the East with velutinate hymenium, pale spores, and setae<br />

on the pores. We have heretofore called this plant Fomes Haskarlii, and Bresadola refers<br />

it to Fomes Korthalsii both names of Leveille, and both doubtful, owing to confusion that<br />

exists as to the types. We are convinced that it is Fomes senex in the original meaning<br />

of Montagne (Juan Fernandez specimens, not the Cuban reference of Montagne), and,<br />

owing to the doubt as to both of Leveille's names, we shall adopt the name Montagne gave<br />

the plant.<br />

Fomes senex, the type form, is a species of wide distribution. There is an abundance<br />

of it at Leiden, which was referred by the old Dutch mycologists to Fomes ferruginosus.<br />

We have an ample collection from Dr. J. C. Koningsberger, Java. It has a rugulose sur-<br />

face, very little context, and many layers of pores.<br />

Fomes velutinosus.<br />

NOTE 110. We believe this is entitled to a name and that it is different from<br />

Fomes senex, to which we have heretofore referred it. It has the same context, color,<br />

and setae, but differs in its surface, its texture, and its pore mouths. The surface is much<br />

smoother, and often has a banded effect, such as has Polyporus licnoides (the type). The<br />

context is softer and well developed. In Fomes senex there is very little context, and<br />

it is harder and difficult to cut. The most marked difference is in the pore mouths, which<br />

in Fomes velutinosus are more strongly velutinate and of a deeper color. The velutinate pore<br />

mouths are caused by dense, colored hyphae, projecting 20 to 30 mic.<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!