18.04.2013 Views

International Organization for Migration (IOM)

International Organization for Migration (IOM)

International Organization for Migration (IOM)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Improving Access to Labour market In<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> migrants and employers<br />

24<br />

uncapped, however, the complexity of the procedures and the housing requirement<br />

contribute to explaining the limited recourse of United States growers to H-2A<br />

visa and continuing trends of irregular employment of undocumented migrants in<br />

agriculture (Chapter 12).<br />

Even in the case of Sweden, where procedures to recruit and apply <strong>for</strong> a work<br />

permit are relatively simple and non-bureaucratic, and migrant inflows are small in<br />

international comparison, waiting times due to backlogs in processing applications<br />

have repeatedly been pointed out by employers as being the biggest hurdle when they<br />

try to hire workers from outside the EU (Chapter 9) 9 . To shorten the processing times<br />

and facilitate recruitment from abroad in response to domestic labour needs, some<br />

countries (such as Australia and Sweden) have introduced systems of certification<br />

of “reputable” employers, which partly exempt those employers from administrative<br />

requirements. While those schemes undoubtedly streamline the immigration<br />

procedures and are particularly interesting in the case of <strong>for</strong>eign recruitment in<br />

response to temporary labour needs, they generally apply only to large employers or<br />

to employers who frequently recruit from abroad and may, thus, contribute to widen<br />

the labour market in<strong>for</strong>mation gap between bigger and smaller firms. In Sweden,<br />

<strong>for</strong> example, companies that submit at least 25 work permit applications a year can<br />

apply to become certified by the <strong>Migration</strong> Board. This certification exempts the<br />

company from the requirement to obtain the trade union’s opinion on wages and<br />

working conditions, and may reduce the waiting time to obtain a work permit to five<br />

days. However, the requirement of 25 applications a year hinders companies with<br />

low recruitment and SMEs from getting certified. Similarly, in the United States<br />

of America the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)<br />

provide a Premium Processing Service <strong>for</strong> employers filing an application to sponsor<br />

a migrant on a non-immigrant visa <strong>for</strong> short-term employment, which guarantees<br />

application processing within 15 calendar days (against a normal average of two to six<br />

months). However, since the service is provided <strong>for</strong> an additional fee of USD 1,225<br />

per application, it is unlikely that small employers have recourse to it.<br />

In most of the countries studied, regulations on intra-corporate transfers also give a<br />

competitive advantage to big firms with subsidiaries and affiliates abroad compared<br />

with SMEs, when trying to fill temporary labour shortages. In the United States, <strong>for</strong><br />

example, businesses that have offices abroad or a <strong>for</strong>eign parent often use the L-1 visa<br />

<strong>for</strong> intra-corporate transfers. This is the most employer-friendly visa allowed under<br />

the United States immigration policy. Certain large corporations with at least 1,000<br />

employees in their United States offices and annual sales of at least USD 25 million<br />

receive a blanket L-certification provided they obtained at least ten L-1 visas during<br />

the past one year. Once granted, the blanket L-certification allows a company to<br />

bypass the USCIS petition process. The L-1A visas <strong>for</strong> intra-corporate transfers of<br />

9 Based on figures from the Swedish <strong>Migration</strong> Board <strong>for</strong> October 2012, the <strong>IOM</strong> LINET country<br />

study on Sweden reports an average processing time of six to seven months, against a target to complete<br />

applications submitted electronically within four weeks. It has to be noted, however, that <strong>for</strong> about half<br />

of the 60,000 decisions that the <strong>Migration</strong> Board processes per year, the companies have to wait <strong>for</strong><br />

less than five weeks.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!