05.05.2013 Views

DRAFT Australian Dietary Guidelines - Eat For Health

DRAFT Australian Dietary Guidelines - Eat For Health

DRAFT Australian Dietary Guidelines - Eat For Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix 7. Equity and the social<br />

determinants of health and nutrition<br />

status<br />

A7.1 Introduction<br />

The World Declaration on Nutrition (1992) states that ‘access to nutritionally adequate and safe<br />

food is a basic individual right’ [992]. Australia is fortunate to have an abundant and safe food<br />

supply. Life expectancy and health status are relatively high [12, 26, 44]. <strong>Australian</strong>s are generally<br />

literate and have good access to health and nutrition information and sufficient education to make<br />

informed food choices [993].<br />

However, there are differences in health and wellbeing between groups of <strong>Australian</strong>s. People in<br />

lower socioeconomic groups have shorter life spans and poorer health. They have higher rates of<br />

death and disease, are more likely to be hospitalised and are less likely to use specialist and<br />

preventative health services [994]. As in other countries, there is a socioeconomic gradient<br />

whereby health status generally improves the higher a person is up the socioeconomic ladder [26].<br />

The determinants of health inequities are largely outside the health system and reflect the<br />

distribution of social, economic and cultural resources and opportunities [27, 28, 992, 994].<br />

Employment, income, education, cultural influences, lifestyle, language, sex and other genetic<br />

differences, geographic, social or cultural isolation, age and disability, the security and standard of<br />

accommodation, and the availability of facilities and services, all influence diet, health and<br />

nutritional status [27, 28].<br />

The relationship between these factors and health status is complex and it is often difficult to<br />

determine the nature and direction of causal relationships [27, 28]. <strong>For</strong> example, those on higher<br />

incomes tend to have greater opportunity to attain higher levels of education and afford housing in<br />

higher socioeconomic areas with better access to goods and services (for example, health<br />

services, transport, shops including food outlets) that support healthy lifestyles. Lower levels of<br />

education and/or an individual’s poor health status can limit opportunities for employment and<br />

therefore income and access to other goods and services, including nutritious food [27, 28].<br />

While higher education can improve health literacy, just because a person can understand healthy<br />

lifestyle and nutrition information does not mean they can or will act on it. <strong>For</strong> example, one<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> study of people 16 years and older found that, although 80% and 35% of people knew<br />

the recommended daily intake of fruit and vegetables respectively, only 56% and under 10% met<br />

these respective recommendations [26].<br />

<strong>DRAFT</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Dietary</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong>- December 2011 178

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!