05.05.2013 Views

DRAFT Australian Dietary Guidelines - Eat For Health

DRAFT Australian Dietary Guidelines - Eat For Health

DRAFT Australian Dietary Guidelines - Eat For Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table A7.1 Mean daily intakes (g/day)from various food groups: people aged 19 years<br />

and over, by SEIFA quintile 2<br />

(grams per day)<br />

First quintile Fifth quintile<br />

(most Second Third Fourth (least<br />

Food group disadvantaged) quintile quintile quintile disadvantaged)<br />

Cereal & cereal products 196 222 203 217 232<br />

Cereal-based products & dishes 113 115 130 135 136<br />

Fruit products & dishes 126 147 141 143 156<br />

Vegetable products & dishes 264 258 260 262 251<br />

Legumes & pulses 9.8 7.9 10.8 9.5 10.7<br />

Milk products & dishes 281 284 285 292 301<br />

Meat, poultry, game 149 163 164 155 158<br />

Fish & seafood 22 24.5 26.3 25.8 28.8<br />

Egg products & dishes 16 15 16 13 19<br />

Snack foods 3.2 3.0 4.2 3.3 3.9<br />

Sugar products & dishes 20 21 20 18 17<br />

Confectionery 7.8 9.2 8.3 9.3 9.1<br />

Seeds & nuts 3.6 4.1 5.2 4.0 4.8<br />

Fats & oils 12 13 13 12 11<br />

Soup 53 62 55 48 57<br />

Savoury sauces & condiments 30 30 28 30 29<br />

Non-alcoholic beverages 2001 2005 1978 2007 1938<br />

Alcoholic beverages 239 254 273 270 234<br />

The key findings were as follows.<br />

Consumption of fruit and fruit products was lower (10–20%) in the most disadvantaged<br />

group compared with the other four groups, but vegetable and legume consumption<br />

showed no consistent trend across the groups. This may be difficult to interpret as potato<br />

chips were included within this category.<br />

Consumption of milk and milk products increased slightly with social advantage—about a<br />

10% increase across the groups.<br />

Consumption of meat, poultry and game was slightly higher in the middle quintiles.<br />

Fish and seafood consumption increased with social advantage – this was thought to be due<br />

to better access to seafood in coastal areas where cities are located, and the higher price<br />

of seafood products compared to other foods [37]).<br />

Consumption of sugar products and dishes tended to decrease with social advantage.<br />

Consumption of cereals and cereal-based foods (for example, rice, pasta and breads) was<br />

lower in the most disadvantaged group and the middle group compared with all other<br />

groups. Consumption of cereal-based products and dishes (for example, cakes and biscuits)<br />

was about 20% lower in the two most disadvantaged groups compared with the other<br />

three [1022].<br />

<strong>DRAFT</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Dietary</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong>- December 2011 182

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!