13.05.2013 Views

historical and political thought in the seventeenth - RePub - Erasmus ...

historical and political thought in the seventeenth - RePub - Erasmus ...

historical and political thought in the seventeenth - RePub - Erasmus ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 4. Times of success. Defend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong><br />

have caused <strong>the</strong> same Booke to be pr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong> some place beyond <strong>the</strong> Seas, <strong>and</strong><br />

to <strong>the</strong> same impression haue added some o<strong>the</strong>r th<strong>in</strong>gs, as if <strong>the</strong>y were parts of<br />

that which was first pr<strong>in</strong>ted here by Our comm<strong>and</strong>’. 25 The most likely suspect<br />

that matches that description is <strong>the</strong> pirate edition of Selden’s Mare Clausum<br />

(The Closed Sea, 1635) that had appeared <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dutch Republic <strong>in</strong> 1636 <strong>and</strong><br />

to which an anonymous pr<strong>in</strong>ter, probably from Amsterdam or Leiden, had<br />

attached a work of Boxhorn called <strong>the</strong> Apologia pro Navigationibus Holl<strong>and</strong>orum<br />

(Defense of <strong>the</strong> Navigations of <strong>the</strong> Holl<strong>and</strong>ers) <strong>and</strong> a copy, from Boxhorn’s library,<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Magnus Intercursus (Great Treaty), <strong>the</strong> famous treaty that <strong>the</strong> English<br />

k<strong>in</strong>g Henry VII (1457-1509) <strong>and</strong> Philip <strong>the</strong> Fair (1478-1506), lord of <strong>the</strong> Habsburg<br />

Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s, had signed on February 24, 1496. 26 Both Boxhorn’s Apologia<br />

<strong>and</strong> his copy of <strong>the</strong> Magnus Intercursus had previously been published <strong>in</strong> one<br />

tome toge<strong>the</strong>r with Grotius’s Mare Liberum <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> De Maribus (On <strong>the</strong> Seas,<br />

1633) of Paulus Merula (1558-1607), professor of history at Leiden University,<br />

<strong>and</strong> it is easy to see why. 27 For <strong>the</strong>y produced evidence that supported Dutch<br />

claims that <strong>the</strong> Dutch held ancient rights to fish freely <strong>and</strong> undisturbed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

seas surround<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> British Isles <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong> Dutch had explored <strong>and</strong> were<br />

accustomed to navigate <strong>and</strong> fish <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn seas. These claims diametrically<br />

opposed Charles I’s own claims to lordship over <strong>the</strong> seas that adjo<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

he feared that ‘that part of <strong>the</strong> work which dealt with <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn seas might offend his bro<strong>the</strong>r-<strong>in</strong>-law’,<br />

k<strong>in</strong>g Christian IV of Denmark, whose sister Anne (1574-1619) James had married <strong>in</strong> 1589 <strong>and</strong> ‘who also<br />

claimed sovereignty over <strong>the</strong> same waters <strong>and</strong> to whom James was <strong>in</strong> debt’. In 1635 Charles I asked<br />

Selden to rewrite <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al version to add weight to his claims that <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>g of Engl<strong>and</strong> was sovereign<br />

over <strong>the</strong> seas surround<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> British Isles <strong>and</strong> that he <strong>the</strong>refore could legally license <strong>the</strong>, predom<strong>in</strong>antly<br />

Dutch, herr<strong>in</strong>g fleets fish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> those waters. Christianson, Discourse on History, Law, <strong>and</strong> Governance <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Public Career of John Selden, pp. 246-51, <strong>and</strong> Helen Thornton, “John Selden’s Response to Hugo Grotius:<br />

The Argument for Closed Seas”, <strong>in</strong> International Journal of Maritime History, Vol. 18, No. 2 (2006), pp.<br />

107-8, with quotes on p. 107.<br />

25 Quotations taken from Peter J. Lucas, “Pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g Anglo-Saxon <strong>in</strong> Holl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> John Selden’s Mare<br />

Clausum seu de Dom<strong>in</strong>io Maris”, <strong>in</strong> Quaerendo, Vol. 31, No. 2 (2001), pp. 125-26.<br />

26 Ibidem. The title page of <strong>the</strong> Boxhorn pirate edition reads: ‘Ioannis Seldeni Mare Clavsvm sev<br />

de Dom<strong>in</strong>io Maris Libri Duo … Accedunt Marci Zverii Boxhornii Apologia Pro navigationibus Holl<strong>and</strong>orum<br />

adversus Pontum Hevterum, et Tractatvs Mvtvi Commercii & navigationis <strong>in</strong>ter Henricvm<br />

VII. Regem Angliae & Philippvm Archiducem Austriae’. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> title page, <strong>the</strong> book was pr<strong>in</strong>ted<br />

by William Stanesby <strong>in</strong> London <strong>in</strong> 1636. The Boxhorn edition was one of three pirate editions of Mare<br />

Clausum that appeared <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dutch Republic <strong>in</strong> 1636, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> great <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> Selden’s book<br />

immediately after its publication. In a letter to Pontanus, June 14, 1636, Boxhorn <strong>in</strong>formed Pontanus<br />

that <strong>in</strong> Leiden it was not possible to get a hold of a copy of Mare Clausum that was pr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Boxhorn, Epistolae et poemata, p. 70. ‘Exemplaria Maris Clausi, quae <strong>in</strong> Anglia excusa, apud nos non possunt<br />

haberi.’<br />

27 Hugo Grotius, De mari libero et P. Merula de Maribus. Marci Zuerii Boxhornii Apologia pro Navigationibus<br />

Holl<strong>and</strong>orum adversus Pontum Heuterum. Qua praecedentium saeculorum navigationes, earumque jura<br />

& <strong>in</strong>stituta, ex tabulis praesetim publicis asseruntur. Tractatus pacis et mutui commercii, sive <strong>in</strong>tercursus mercium,<br />

conclusus Lond<strong>in</strong>i Anno 1495 die Februarii XXIV <strong>in</strong>ter Henricum Septimum Angliae regem, & Philippum<br />

Archiducem Austriae, Burgundiae, &c. Ex Biblio<strong>the</strong>ca Marci Zuerii Boxhornii. (Elzevier; Leiden, 1633).<br />

Three editions had appeared that same year. Boxhorn had dedicated <strong>the</strong> Apologia to Willem de Bont,<br />

<strong>the</strong> bailiff of Leiden. For De Bont, see chapter 3. In this <strong>the</strong>sis all page references to <strong>the</strong> Apologia <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Tractatus refer to <strong>the</strong>ir editions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> edition of Grotius’s De mari libero of 1633.<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!