13.05.2013 Views

historical and political thought in the seventeenth - RePub - Erasmus ...

historical and political thought in the seventeenth - RePub - Erasmus ...

historical and political thought in the seventeenth - RePub - Erasmus ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3. Biography<br />

town, prov<strong>in</strong>ce, or even perhaps <strong>the</strong> history of <strong>the</strong> young Dutch Republic. If<br />

Boxhorn wanted <strong>in</strong>struction <strong>in</strong> this field of history he could have turned to his<br />

patron Scriverius who was one of <strong>the</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g antiquarians on <strong>the</strong> Dutch past.<br />

Burgersdijk’s teach<strong>in</strong>g would have taught Boxhorn that it was natural<br />

for man to live with his fellow-men <strong>in</strong> a <strong>political</strong> society. It would also have<br />

taught Boxhorn that monarchy is <strong>the</strong> best form of government, but that given<br />

<strong>the</strong> circumstances this is not always <strong>the</strong> case. In He<strong>in</strong>sius’s edition of Aristotle’s<br />

Politics Boxhorn would have found material that concurred with Burgersdijk’s<br />

teach<strong>in</strong>g, but also material that offered alternatives to <strong>the</strong> tradition<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> politica at Leiden University <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first half of <strong>the</strong> <strong>seventeenth</strong> century,<br />

which favoured monarchy.<br />

Scriverius’s work <strong>and</strong> perhaps also his personal teach<strong>in</strong>g would have <strong>in</strong>troduced<br />

Boxhorn to <strong>the</strong> <strong>historical</strong> work of <strong>the</strong> antiquarian. This work focused<br />

on <strong>the</strong> collect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> study<strong>in</strong>g of sources. These sources <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

<strong>the</strong>y conta<strong>in</strong>ed could be applied for ‘<strong>political</strong>’ ends, which Scriverius did. ‘In<br />

this way’ Scriverius’s ‘antiquarianism compared strongly with <strong>the</strong> didactical<br />

<strong>political</strong> histories of <strong>the</strong> humanist historians’. 139<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, Scriverius would probably have po<strong>in</strong>ted out to Boxhorn <strong>the</strong> importance<br />

of go<strong>in</strong>g ad fontes; to f<strong>in</strong>d out <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al <strong>historical</strong> documents <strong>in</strong>stead of<br />

rely<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> versions of <strong>the</strong>se documents that had been h<strong>and</strong>ed down by later<br />

scholars. From He<strong>in</strong>sius Boxhorn could have learned ano<strong>the</strong>r employment of <strong>the</strong><br />

ad fontes pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, namely to f<strong>in</strong>d out <strong>the</strong> causes of certa<strong>in</strong> past events, a method<br />

of <strong>in</strong>quiry that He<strong>in</strong>sius believed <strong>the</strong> ‘<strong>political</strong> man’ should follow ‘<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> study<br />

of past events’. All <strong>in</strong> all, <strong>the</strong> work of He<strong>in</strong>sius, Burgersdijk, <strong>and</strong> Scriverius would<br />

have given a young man like Boxhorn <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to several different aspects of<br />

history <strong>and</strong> politics <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terrelationship between <strong>the</strong>se two branches of<br />

knowledge as this <strong>in</strong>terrelationship was seen <strong>in</strong> early modern Europe.<br />

1. Career<br />

Professor (1632-1653)<br />

Boxhorn f<strong>in</strong>ished <strong>the</strong> artes-programme by at least 1629. 140 This was not <strong>the</strong><br />

end of his student days, because after complet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> artes-programme Boxhorn<br />

went on to study <strong>the</strong>ology. He was a good <strong>the</strong>ology student, ‘but s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

139 Langereis, Geschiedenis als ambacht, p. 362. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to S<strong>and</strong>ra Langereis this not only applies to<br />

<strong>the</strong> antiquarianism of Scriverius, but also to that of Buchelius.<br />

140 See footnote 64 above.<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!