historical and political thought in the seventeenth - RePub - Erasmus ...
historical and political thought in the seventeenth - RePub - Erasmus ...
historical and political thought in the seventeenth - RePub - Erasmus ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 2. Intellectual context<br />
about <strong>the</strong> fragmented <strong>political</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure of <strong>the</strong> Dutch Republic, about <strong>the</strong><br />
question of religious unity vis-à-vis religious toleration, <strong>and</strong> about <strong>the</strong> possibilty<br />
of concord between several people <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> means of achiev<strong>in</strong>g it.<br />
The Dutch preoccupation with concord can be seen as form<strong>in</strong>g a part of<br />
<strong>the</strong> European wide quest for order <strong>and</strong> stability. This quest, fostered by <strong>the</strong><br />
civil <strong>and</strong> religious wars that plagued Europe <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sixteenth <strong>and</strong> <strong>seventeenth</strong><br />
centuries, did not rema<strong>in</strong> conf<strong>in</strong>ed to <strong>the</strong> world of politics or religion. It also<br />
extented to <strong>the</strong> realm of science <strong>and</strong> philosophy.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> view of Richard Popk<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Reformation had led to a crise pyrrhonienne,<br />
an <strong>in</strong>tellectual crisis <strong>in</strong> which ‘f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g a criterion of truth’ <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field<br />
of religion had eventually led to ‘an assault on <strong>the</strong> bases of all knowledge’<br />
that rendered uncerta<strong>in</strong> all forms of scientific <strong>and</strong> religious knowledge. 119 It<br />
was this crisis that triggered Descartes to develop his philosophy. In short,<br />
Descartes believed that by doubt<strong>in</strong>g man could acquire a knowledge that was<br />
beyond doubt. In first <strong>in</strong>stance, doubt<strong>in</strong>g, if ‘properly <strong>and</strong> diligently’ conducted,<br />
will make man ‘completely uncerta<strong>in</strong> of everyth<strong>in</strong>g’. But <strong>the</strong>n man<br />
can become aware of <strong>the</strong> fact that he is doubt<strong>in</strong>g or th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore<br />
must exist – Descartes’s famous cogito ergo sum (‘I th<strong>in</strong>k, <strong>the</strong>refore I am’).<br />
Descartes believed ‘this truth “I th<strong>in</strong>k, <strong>the</strong>refore I am”’ to be ‘so certa<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
so assured’ that he declared it to be ‘<strong>the</strong> first pr<strong>in</strong>cicple of <strong>the</strong> Philosophy for<br />
which I was seek<strong>in</strong>g’. Thus, <strong>the</strong> Frenchman found his answer to <strong>the</strong> sceptical<br />
crisis of <strong>the</strong> age <strong>in</strong> scepticism itself. 120<br />
The impact of Descartes’s ideas on <strong>the</strong> European stage was profound. In his<br />
monumental study of <strong>the</strong> Radical Enlightenment Jonathan Israel has identified<br />
Cartesianism as one of <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> causes beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> so-called ‘Crisis of <strong>the</strong><br />
European M<strong>in</strong>d’, a phenomenon that Israel described as ‘<strong>the</strong> unprecedented<br />
<strong>in</strong>tellectual turmoil which commenced <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mid-<strong>seventeenth</strong> century, with<br />
<strong>the</strong> rise of Cartesianism <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> subsequent spread of “mechanical philosophy”<br />
or <strong>the</strong> “mechanistic world-view”, an upheaval which heralded <strong>the</strong> onset<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Enlightenment proper <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> clos<strong>in</strong>g years of <strong>the</strong> century’. 121 In Israel’s<br />
story Cartesianism played an important role <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> disruption of ‘<strong>the</strong> cultural<br />
119 Richard Popk<strong>in</strong>, The History of Scepticism: From Savonarola to Bayle. Revised <strong>and</strong> Exp<strong>and</strong>ed Edition<br />
(Oxford University Press; Oxford, 1 st ed. 1979, 2003), pp. 3, 97-98, with quotes on p. 3 <strong>and</strong> p. 97.<br />
The term ‘pyrrhonienne’ is derived from Pyrrho of Elis (c.360-c.270 BC), a Greek philosopher who is<br />
regarded as <strong>the</strong> founder of scepticism. In <strong>the</strong> words of Richard Popk<strong>in</strong>, Pyrrho ‘was not a <strong>the</strong>oretician<br />
but ra<strong>the</strong>r a liv<strong>in</strong>g example of <strong>the</strong> complete doubter, <strong>the</strong> man who would not commit himself to any<br />
judgment that went beyond what seemed to be <strong>the</strong> case’. Ibidem, xviii.<br />
120 Ibidem, pp. 143-57, with quotes on p. 151. Popk<strong>in</strong> quotes René Descartes, Discours de la Méthode,<br />
IV.<br />
121 Jonathan I. Israel, Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mak<strong>in</strong>g of Modernity, 1650-1750 (Oxford<br />
University Press; Oxford, 1 st ed. 2001, 2002), p. 14.<br />
31