historical and political thought in the seventeenth - RePub - Erasmus ...
historical and political thought in the seventeenth - RePub - Erasmus ...
historical and political thought in the seventeenth - RePub - Erasmus ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4<br />
Chapter 1. Introduction<br />
Second, we need to get to know <strong>the</strong> man beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> name. Who was Boxhorn?<br />
Where did he came from? Who were his family <strong>and</strong> friends? Where<br />
did he live? Where did he study, with whom, <strong>and</strong>, especially important for<br />
our <strong>in</strong>vestigation, what did his teachers taught students like Boxhorn about<br />
history <strong>and</strong> politics? The answers to <strong>the</strong>se questions can be found <strong>in</strong> chapter<br />
3 that holds a biography of Boxhorn’s life <strong>in</strong> which special attention is paid to<br />
his educational background.<br />
Third, after we have acquired a broad overview of Boxhorn’s life, we need<br />
to go deeper <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigate his scholarly activities more attentively. Of special<br />
<strong>in</strong>terest is to f<strong>in</strong>d out how Boxhorn looked at <strong>the</strong> events <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>mes that<br />
played an important role dur<strong>in</strong>g his lifetime. We beg<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> chapter 4 by look<strong>in</strong>g<br />
at <strong>the</strong> period from <strong>the</strong> early 1630s to 1648. Two major <strong>the</strong>mes are discussed<br />
<strong>in</strong> this chapter: Boxhorn’s defence of Dutch maritime activities, <strong>and</strong> his view<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Dutch war with <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>g of Spa<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> its conclusion with <strong>the</strong> peace of<br />
Münster <strong>in</strong> 1648. Why did Boxhorn deem Dutch maritime activies important<br />
<strong>and</strong> how did Boxhorn perceive <strong>the</strong> war with <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>g of Spa<strong>in</strong> are important<br />
questions we will try to answer <strong>in</strong> this chapter. In chapter 5 we concentrate<br />
on <strong>the</strong> period after <strong>the</strong> peace of Münster. In this chapter we take a close<br />
look at how Boxhorn reacted to <strong>the</strong> execution of k<strong>in</strong>g Charles I of Engl<strong>and</strong><br />
(1600-1649), what he <strong>thought</strong> about <strong>the</strong> English Commonwealth, <strong>and</strong> how he<br />
<strong>thought</strong> about <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>and</strong> structure of <strong>the</strong> Dutch Republic.<br />
Fourth, <strong>in</strong> 1647 a scholarly dispute erupted at Leiden University over<br />
Descartes’s ideas, <strong>the</strong> publication <strong>and</strong> reception of which constituted one of<br />
<strong>the</strong> most important <strong>in</strong>tellectual events that occured dur<strong>in</strong>g Boxhorn’s lifetime.<br />
What Boxhorn’s position <strong>in</strong> this scholarly dispute was is a question that will<br />
be answered <strong>in</strong> chapter 6. In this chapter we will also look at Boxhorn’s l<strong>in</strong>guistic<br />
work <strong>and</strong> how it is connected to <strong>the</strong> ‘first Cartesian war’.<br />
Fifth, chapters 7 to 9 form <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellectual core of this study. In <strong>the</strong>se chapters<br />
we attempt to get a thorough underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of Boxhorn’s <strong>historical</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>political</strong> <strong>thought</strong>. Questions relat<strong>in</strong>g to Boxhorn’s <strong>historical</strong> <strong>thought</strong> are discussed<br />
first. How did Boxhorn <strong>thought</strong> about history <strong>and</strong> how did he himself<br />
conduct history? These are <strong>the</strong> two central questions we need to answer if<br />
we want to underst<strong>and</strong> Boxhorn’s <strong>historical</strong> <strong>thought</strong> properly <strong>and</strong> to which<br />
chapter 7 provides <strong>the</strong> answers.<br />
The discussion of Boxhorn’s <strong>political</strong> <strong>thought</strong> is divided over two chapters.<br />
Chapter 8 conta<strong>in</strong>s a thorough <strong>in</strong>vestigation of <strong>the</strong> Institutiones politicae (Political<br />
Instructions, 1656) <strong>and</strong> deals with <strong>the</strong> more <strong>the</strong>oretical aspects of Boxhorn’s<br />
<strong>political</strong> <strong>thought</strong>. How did Boxhorn def<strong>in</strong>e politics, what was his view of<br />
man, <strong>and</strong> which form of government did he prefer are some of <strong>the</strong> questions<br />
that are treated <strong>in</strong> this chapter. Then we focus on Boxhorn’s practical <strong>political</strong>