13.05.2013 Views

historical and political thought in the seventeenth - RePub - Erasmus ...

historical and political thought in the seventeenth - RePub - Erasmus ...

historical and political thought in the seventeenth - RePub - Erasmus ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 8. The science of politics. The Institutiones politicae<br />

In contrast to <strong>the</strong> silent freedom from obedience, <strong>the</strong> expressed freedom<br />

from obedience is <strong>the</strong> freedom that is laid down <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> laws <strong>and</strong> agreements<br />

that clearly state <strong>the</strong> rights subjects have <strong>and</strong> rulers should respect. 107<br />

These agreements are <strong>the</strong> leges fundamentales or fundamental laws, <strong>and</strong> Boxhorn<br />

explicitly describes <strong>the</strong>m as contracts between private <strong>in</strong>dividuals who<br />

have come to an agreement about <strong>the</strong>ir mutual rights <strong>and</strong> obligations. 108<br />

These fundamentals laws could have come <strong>in</strong>to force at <strong>the</strong> moment of <strong>the</strong><br />

foundation of <strong>the</strong> commonwealth, like those of Venice. But <strong>the</strong>y could also<br />

have come <strong>in</strong>to be<strong>in</strong>g as time went by, grow<strong>in</strong>g or dim<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g under <strong>the</strong> pressure<br />

of ever-chang<strong>in</strong>g circumstances that force <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> factions<br />

that make up society to constantly renegotiate <strong>the</strong>ir mutual relationships. 109<br />

As we have seen <strong>in</strong> chapter 7, this had been <strong>the</strong> case <strong>in</strong> both ancient Rome <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>ce of Holl<strong>and</strong>. In <strong>the</strong> Institutiones politicae we see that this also holds<br />

good for <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s as a whole. In first <strong>in</strong>stance Boxhorn follows Grotius’s<br />

conclusion <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> De antiquitate that <strong>the</strong> ancient Batavians had elected<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir k<strong>in</strong>gs, just like <strong>the</strong> ancient Germans had done <strong>in</strong> Tacitus’s Germania (On<br />

Germany). 110 On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, Boxhorn also states that <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past <strong>the</strong> Dutch<br />

had taken special care to augment <strong>the</strong>ir freedom by claim<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> receiv<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

ever more fundamental laws from <strong>the</strong>ir counts. 111 Seen from this perspective,<br />

Dutch freedom is as much a common good as it is a <strong>historical</strong> product. 112<br />

Among <strong>the</strong> rights subjects should lay down <strong>in</strong> fundamental laws is <strong>the</strong><br />

protection of <strong>the</strong>ir property, particularly aga<strong>in</strong>st arbitrary taxation. 113 Boxhorn<br />

common good’ was ‘<strong>the</strong> core concept of <strong>the</strong> debate’ ‘about limit<strong>in</strong>g royal power’. ‘This common good<br />

referred to a twofold goal of politics, a beatitudo for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual citizen, which laid <strong>in</strong> some sense<br />

beyond <strong>the</strong> state, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> conservation of <strong>the</strong> state by means of a moderated reason of state.’ Boxhorn’s<br />

use of <strong>the</strong> concept seems to po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> direction of <strong>the</strong> second goal. Wolfgang Weber, “‘What a Good<br />

Ruler Should Not Do’: Theoretical Limits of Royal Power <strong>in</strong> European Theories of Absolutism, 1500-<br />

1700”, <strong>in</strong> Sixteenth Century Journal, Vol. 26, No. 4 (1995), pp. 897-902, with quotes on p. 897.<br />

107 Boxhorn, Institutiones politicae, I.5.10, pp. 47-48. ‘Expressa est, quae versatur circa s<strong>in</strong>gulares & certas<br />

quasdam leges, ac conditiones, disertim propositas, quas sanctè se, & perpetuò observaturos, Imperaturi,<br />

ante Imperium, solenni juramento testantur; quibus, aut Imperantium libid<strong>in</strong>e quaedam exem[p]<br />

ta, arbitrio subditorum rel<strong>in</strong>quuntur <strong>in</strong>tegra, aut Imperantibus ea s<strong>in</strong>gulatim m<strong>and</strong>antur, quae omn<strong>in</strong>o<br />

praestare tenentur, ac privilegia & immunitates à Majoribus accepta, rata habentur & confirmantur, aut<br />

denique quae sub praecedentium Imperio gravis aut nimia autoritas fuit, quantum expedit, coercetur.’<br />

108 Ibidem, I.5.22-25, pp. 50-51. Thus, one might say that while <strong>the</strong> ‘silent freedom from obedience’ is<br />

grounded on natural law pr<strong>in</strong>ciples, <strong>the</strong> ‘expressed freedom from obedience’ f<strong>in</strong>ds its orig<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> positive law.<br />

109 Thus, <strong>the</strong>ir be<strong>in</strong>g ‘fundamental’ has not so much to do with <strong>the</strong>m be<strong>in</strong>g ‘immutable’, but by <strong>the</strong><br />

subjects that <strong>the</strong>se ‘fundamental’ laws address: <strong>the</strong> most important matters <strong>in</strong> a <strong>political</strong> society.<br />

110 Boxhorn, Institutiones politicae, I.5, p. 58; Grotius, The Antiquity of <strong>the</strong> Batavian Republic, II.5, 11-14,<br />

pp. 61-63; Tacitus, Germania, VII, XXIX-XXXI, especially XXX.2.<br />

111 Ibidem, I.9, p. 131. ‘Et certè tantùm faciunt ad praesidium libertatis, ut augeri plerumque soleant,<br />

novisque Pr<strong>in</strong>cipibus electis novae addantur, quod à Belgis, dum sub Comitibus agerent, accuratè<br />

observatum est.’<br />

112 In <strong>the</strong> previous chapters we have already seen that Boxhorn equited ‘Dutch freedom’ with <strong>the</strong><br />

rights <strong>and</strong> privileges that were expressed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> charters of Dutch towns.<br />

113 Boxhorn, Institutiones politicae, I.5.19, p. 49. ‘(II.) Ad opes subditorum. Ne scilicet iisdem liceat<br />

267

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!