13.05.2013 Views

historical and political thought in the seventeenth - RePub - Erasmus ...

historical and political thought in the seventeenth - RePub - Erasmus ...

historical and political thought in the seventeenth - RePub - Erasmus ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

146<br />

Chapter 5. Times of trouble. Tak<strong>in</strong>g a st<strong>and</strong><br />

sovereignty proved to be hardly applicable to <strong>the</strong> Dutch situation. 123 In <strong>the</strong><br />

Commentariolus Boxhorn, who refers to <strong>the</strong> powers or <strong>the</strong> rights of <strong>the</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

States <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> town councils with <strong>the</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> terms summum imperium (<strong>the</strong><br />

supreme power to comm<strong>and</strong>), seems to subscribe to this po<strong>in</strong>t. 124<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, Boxhorn addresses an issue that Vranck leaves unmentioned,<br />

namely that <strong>in</strong> matters concern<strong>in</strong>g war <strong>and</strong> peace, taxation, <strong>and</strong> alliances decisions<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial States, unlike those <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> town councils, had to be<br />

unanimous. 125 The requirement of unanimity was <strong>in</strong>spired by <strong>the</strong> lovely ideal<br />

that ‘strength lies <strong>in</strong> unity’. 126 In practice, however, it often proved difficult to<br />

meet this requirement. Each town had its own special <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>and</strong> was reluctant<br />

to concede <strong>the</strong>m for <strong>the</strong> greater common good, or was only will<strong>in</strong>g to do<br />

so if duly compensated. Thus, <strong>the</strong> decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g process <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>ce of<br />

Holl<strong>and</strong> often <strong>in</strong>volved a lot of bicker<strong>in</strong>g, barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> mediation, which<br />

br<strong>in</strong>gs us to <strong>the</strong> office of <strong>the</strong> stadholder. 127<br />

The tension between <strong>the</strong> need for unity <strong>and</strong> unanimity on both <strong>the</strong> Generality<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial level, on <strong>the</strong> one h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> diversity of power<br />

on <strong>the</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial level <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> local level, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, is reflected <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

image that Boxhorn provides of <strong>the</strong> two most important offices that existed <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Dutch Republic, namely <strong>the</strong> offices of capta<strong>in</strong>-general <strong>and</strong> stadholder. 128<br />

The first office falls under <strong>the</strong> responsibility of <strong>the</strong> Generality. It provides its<br />

office-holder with a certa<strong>in</strong> majestas that is acquired dur<strong>in</strong>g accomplishments<br />

<strong>in</strong> wartime. However, <strong>the</strong> capta<strong>in</strong>-general does not represent <strong>the</strong> majestas of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Union itself. That is done by <strong>the</strong> three or four delegates from <strong>the</strong> States<br />

General who accompany <strong>the</strong> capta<strong>in</strong>-general dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Republic’s war campaigns.<br />

The prerogatives of <strong>the</strong> capta<strong>in</strong>-general are restricted: he is not allowed<br />

123 Van Gelderen, “Aristotelians, Monarchomachs <strong>and</strong> Republicans”, pp. 197-204. Grotius, for<br />

example, used <strong>the</strong> words summa potestas <strong>in</strong>stead of majestas to <strong>in</strong>dicate what he saw as <strong>the</strong> ‘supreme<br />

power’ <strong>in</strong> <strong>political</strong> society. See, for example, Grotius, The Rights of War <strong>and</strong> Peace, I.3.6, pp. 257-59.<br />

124 The powers or rights Boxhorn assigns to <strong>the</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial States <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> town councils are similar<br />

to <strong>the</strong> prerogatives he assigns to a sovereign. See chapter 8.<br />

125 Boxhorn, Commentariolus, X.28, p. 161. ‘In rebus tamen maximi momenti, ut novis tributis & vectigalibus,<br />

bello <strong>in</strong>dicendo aut f<strong>in</strong>iendo, novis foederibus <strong>in</strong>eundis non ratum habetur, quod sola major<br />

pars decreverit, sed omnium consensus necessario expectatur.’ See also idem, Institutiones politicae, I.8,<br />

pp. 113-14.<br />

126 Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> famous adage, taken from Sallust: ‘Nam concordia paruae res crescunt, discordia<br />

maxumae dilabuntur.’ ‘In harmony, small th<strong>in</strong>gs grow; <strong>in</strong> disharmony, <strong>the</strong> greatest are dissipated.’<br />

Lat<strong>in</strong> text taken from Sallust, Ivgvrtha, X.6, p. 60. English translation taken from Sallust, The Jugurth<strong>in</strong>e<br />

War, X.6, p. 57. ‘Concordia res parvae crescunt’ was <strong>the</strong> adage of <strong>the</strong> Dutch Republic. For ‘unity’ as a<br />

goal of local Dutch politics, see Judith Pollmann, “Eendracht maakt macht: stedelijke cultuuridealen en<br />

politieke werkelijkheid <strong>in</strong> de Republiek”, <strong>in</strong> Bos, Ebben <strong>and</strong> Te Velde (eds.), Harmonie <strong>in</strong> Holl<strong>and</strong>, pp.<br />

134-51, 254-57.<br />

127 As Lesley Price holds, <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of unanimity ‘meant that reach<strong>in</strong>g decisions, particularly on<br />

important issues, could be difficult, but it prevented a dictatorship of <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>and</strong> put a premium<br />

on negotiation, compromise, <strong>and</strong> realism’. Price, Holl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dutch Republic, p. 125.<br />

128 In <strong>the</strong> Commentariolus <strong>the</strong> stadholder is styled as ‘supremus gubernator’.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!