13.05.2013 Views

historical and political thought in the seventeenth - RePub - Erasmus ...

historical and political thought in the seventeenth - RePub - Erasmus ...

historical and political thought in the seventeenth - RePub - Erasmus ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 7. The mistress of life<br />

tance. 53 The Theatrum’s methodological pr<strong>in</strong>ciple is neatly summarised <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

first chapter: ‘<strong>the</strong> words <strong>the</strong>mselves are accustomed to lead<strong>in</strong>g us to <strong>the</strong> real<br />

knowledge of th<strong>in</strong>gs.’ 54 True to his humanist education, <strong>the</strong>n, Boxhorn’s <strong>in</strong>tention<br />

is to f<strong>in</strong>d out <strong>the</strong> real mean<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> words <strong>in</strong> order to get to ‘<strong>the</strong> real<br />

knowledge of th<strong>in</strong>gs’. He does so by apply<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> critical philological techniques<br />

available to him, although, it must be said, not so accurate <strong>and</strong> meticulously<br />

as his tutors did, <strong>the</strong> esteemed scholars <strong>and</strong> antiquarians Petrus Scriverius<br />

<strong>and</strong> Johannes Isacius Pontanus. 55<br />

In short, Boxhorn’s approach <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Theatrum comes down to this: first, he<br />

discusses <strong>the</strong> different op<strong>in</strong>ions of ancient <strong>and</strong> modern scholars on <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of certa<strong>in</strong> words, <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>s of peoples or customs, or <strong>the</strong> dates of certa<strong>in</strong><br />

documents. Then he sets forth his own op<strong>in</strong>ion, scrut<strong>in</strong>is<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> evidence by<br />

cross exam<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> available documents with o<strong>the</strong>r sources <strong>and</strong> authors that<br />

are closest <strong>in</strong> time, connect<strong>in</strong>g disputed dates with chronological undisputed<br />

facts (e.g. <strong>the</strong> reign of some emperor or pope), <strong>and</strong> trac<strong>in</strong>g words to <strong>the</strong>ir most<br />

likely etymological orig<strong>in</strong> by compar<strong>in</strong>g words of different European languages,<br />

old <strong>and</strong> new, <strong>and</strong> trac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong>ir mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> time.<br />

This is accompanied by a hostile attitude towards those scholars that trace<br />

<strong>the</strong> names of towns or areas to such legendary figures as Bato, <strong>the</strong> supposed<br />

founder of Batavia. 56<br />

53 Thus, first comes a description of Dordrecht, <strong>the</strong>n Haarlem, Delft, Leiden, Amsterdam, Gouda,<br />

Rotterdam, etc. There are some small differences between <strong>the</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> version of 1632 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dutch version<br />

of 1634. First, many poems that are attached to <strong>the</strong> descriptions of <strong>the</strong> towns <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> version<br />

of 1632 do not reappair <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dutch version of 1634. Second, <strong>the</strong> Dutch version of 1634 conta<strong>in</strong>s more<br />

copies of documents, especially of town-privileges. Third, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dutch version of 1634 <strong>the</strong> descriptions<br />

of <strong>the</strong> towns Willemstad, Geertvliet, <strong>and</strong> Heenvliet have been left out.<br />

54 Boxhorn, Theatrum, p. 3 ‘Solent enim, uti docent Sapientes, ipsa nom<strong>in</strong>a nos deducere <strong>in</strong> solidam<br />

cognitionem rerum.’ In his oration on <strong>the</strong> value of history, Vossius made <strong>the</strong> same connection. Vossius,<br />

De historiae vtilitate oratio, p. 2. ‘Pr<strong>in</strong>cipiò penitùs evellendus error, qui multorum animos <strong>in</strong>sedit; perire,<br />

& potiori doctr<strong>in</strong>ae rerum decedere, quicquid temporis, verbis impenditur. Atqui, ut sapientissimè à<br />

magno illo Stagirita olim dictum, vocabula sunt notae eorum, quae animo concepimus; conceptus, signa<br />

rerum: ut verba qui aspernantur ad rerum scientiam sibi iter praecludant. Praeterea non cogitant hom<strong>in</strong>es,<br />

cum literaturae partes s<strong>in</strong>t duae, quarum <strong>in</strong> verbis una consistit, altera <strong>in</strong> rebus; non seorsim illam<br />

verborum parari, sed conjungi utramque.’ The Stagirite is, of course, Aristotle, who discussed this relation<br />

between words <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g of th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> his Organon.<br />

55 In <strong>the</strong> preface to <strong>the</strong> Reygersberch’s chronicle Boxhorn admitted that much <strong>and</strong> apologised for<br />

<strong>the</strong> mistakes he had made <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Theatrum. Boxhorn, “Preface to <strong>the</strong> reader”, i. Arnoldus Buchelius,<br />

<strong>the</strong> antiquarian from Utrecht, had several comments on <strong>the</strong> Theatrum. See Langereis, Geschiedenis als<br />

ambacht, pp. 186-87.<br />

56 Boxhorn, Theatrum, p. 95. ‘De Doro<strong>the</strong>o igitur illo viro, ut ipse [i.e. Joannes Gerbr<strong>and</strong>us –JN]<br />

vocat, nom<strong>in</strong>atissimo, nihil certi habent nostri annales. Metuo ne fit a fabula & illorum haeresi, qui<br />

ubi Batonem Bataviae, Zial<strong>and</strong>um Zel<strong>and</strong>iae, Metellum Middelburgi, Vlissem, Vliss<strong>in</strong>gae, Syr<strong>in</strong>gum<br />

Siriczeae, Rotterum Rotterodami conditores, ipsi sibi, pessimo exemplo pepere, cornicum oculos confixisse<br />

se putant. Quae pestis superioris saeculi litteratos, si Dis placet, ita <strong>in</strong>vasit, ut ex eorum cerebro,<br />

tamquam equo Trojano, <strong>in</strong>numeri prodier<strong>in</strong>t ejuscemodi nunquam nati Heroes. Hoc pestilens sydus<br />

& politissimum illum Hadrianum Iunium quoque adflavit: qui Dordrechtum non Doro<strong>the</strong>, sed Dureti<br />

cujusdam, gentilitia nota <strong>in</strong>signis olim viri, forum fuisse conjicit, cujus Historiis nostris, sed obscuram<br />

& exilem fieri mentionem tradit.’<br />

207

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!