04.06.2013 Views

Billing Code - PHMSA - Department of Transportation

Billing Code - PHMSA - Department of Transportation

Billing Code - PHMSA - Department of Transportation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

This concern led the international community to adopt in the 17 th Revised Edition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

UN Model Regulations a special provision associated with fuel-related Class 3 entries.<br />

Special Provision 363, as adopted in the UN Model Regulations, requires an article<br />

that contains fuel in excess <strong>of</strong> the limited quantity authorized amount and is ineligible to<br />

be described as Dangerous Goods in Machinery or Apparatus, UN3363, to conform to<br />

several general provisions to avoid being subject to the remainder <strong>of</strong> the HMR. In the<br />

August 15, 2012 NPRM, <strong>PHMSA</strong> proposed the addition <strong>of</strong> SP 363 for transportation by<br />

vessel to various Class 3 fuels modelled on the corresponding special provision adopted in<br />

the UN Model Regulations. <strong>PHMSA</strong> received three comments (Caterpillar, DGAC, &<br />

IVODGA) concerning our proposed adoption <strong>of</strong> special provision 363.<br />

Both DGAC and Caterpillar were opposed to <strong>PHMSA</strong>’s adoption <strong>of</strong> special<br />

provision 363. Caterpillar stated that <strong>PHMSA</strong>’s proposed addition <strong>of</strong> special provision<br />

363 was not based on sufficient data demonstrating the revision would improve transport<br />

safety. Caterpillar also stated that the change would introduce conflicting requirements<br />

and regulatory uncertainty and would be excessively burdensome. DGAC stated that the<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> special provision 363 would introduce conflicting requirements and regulatory<br />

uncertainty, and highlighted a proposal they will present to the UN to clarify special<br />

provision 363.<br />

Caterpillar noted that the proposal in the August 15, 2012 NPRM does not<br />

demonstrate through data obtained via scientific methodology any connection between the<br />

proposed revision and enhanced reductions in risks to people and the environment for all<br />

affected shipments. Caterpillar and DGAC noted that the adoption <strong>of</strong> the changes<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!