04.06.2013 Views

Billing Code - PHMSA - Department of Transportation

Billing Code - PHMSA - Department of Transportation

Billing Code - PHMSA - Department of Transportation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

flammable liquids. In this final rule, <strong>PHMSA</strong> is revising special provision 47 to clarify<br />

that the requirement that each packaging must correspond with a design type that has<br />

passed a leakpro<strong>of</strong>ness test at the Packing Group II level applies only to single packagings.<br />

Special Provision 48<br />

Special provision 48 provides classification exceptions for mixtures <strong>of</strong> solids and<br />

toxic liquids. In this final rule, <strong>PHMSA</strong> is revising special provision 48 to clarify that the<br />

requirement that each packaging must correspond with a design type that has passed a<br />

leakpro<strong>of</strong>ness test at the Packing Group II level applies only to single packagings.<br />

Special Provision 49<br />

Special provision 49 provides classification exceptions for mixtures <strong>of</strong> solids and<br />

corrosive liquids. In this final rule, <strong>PHMSA</strong> is revising special provision 49 to clarify that<br />

the requirement that each packaging must correspond with a design type that has passed a<br />

leakpro<strong>of</strong>ness test at the Packing Group II level applies only to single packagings.<br />

Special Provision 101<br />

In a NPRM published in the Federal Register on August 31, 2006 (71 FR 51895),<br />

we proposed to remove § 172.102(c)(1), Special provision 101. In the NPRM, we stated<br />

that with the introduction <strong>of</strong> the letter ''G'' in Column (1), which requires the n.o.s. and<br />

generic proper shipping names to be supplemented with the technical name <strong>of</strong> the<br />

hazardous material, special provision 101 became obsolete. Consequently, because we did<br />

not receive public comment, the amendment was adopted as proposed in a final rule<br />

published in the Federal Register on December 29, 2006 (71 FR 78596).<br />

Consequences <strong>of</strong> the removal <strong>of</strong> § 172.102(c)(1) Special provision 101 in 2006<br />

may have resulted in noncompliance for certain <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Defense (DOD) explosive<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!