30.06.2013 Views

Understandability and Transparency of the Financial Statements of ...

Understandability and Transparency of the Financial Statements of ...

Understandability and Transparency of the Financial Statements of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

To assure <strong>the</strong> study was dependable a couple <strong>of</strong> techniques were utilised. First, a semi-<br />

structured interview guide enabled <strong>the</strong> comparability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> semi-structured interviews<br />

(Appendix Three) by asking <strong>the</strong> same question <strong>of</strong> each semi-structured interviewee<br />

(Patton, 1990).<br />

Second, interviews were assessed to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re was any incidence <strong>of</strong><br />

inquirer bias, in particular if <strong>the</strong> interviewee was not allowed to finish <strong>the</strong>ir statement<br />

(Lincoln & Guba, 1985). Unfortunately, this study found two instances <strong>of</strong> interviews in<br />

<strong>the</strong> earlier stages <strong>of</strong> data collection where <strong>the</strong> interviewee was „cut-<strong>of</strong>f‟. Fortunately, in<br />

both cases <strong>the</strong> interviewee said that <strong>the</strong>y hadn‟t finished <strong>the</strong>ir point yet <strong>and</strong> a valuable<br />

lesson was learnt, i.e. to wait for <strong>the</strong> interviewee to finish. Finally, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re was<br />

any conflicting evidence that disproved <strong>the</strong> claim <strong>of</strong> saturation was considered <strong>and</strong> none<br />

was found.<br />

4.7.4 Confirmability<br />

Confirmability is <strong>the</strong> degree to which <strong>the</strong> actual description holds true or is logical<br />

(Ghauri & Gronhaug, 2005), i.e. that <strong>the</strong> researcher is not making up or distorting things<br />

<strong>the</strong> interviewees say. Confirmability is <strong>the</strong> qualitative equivalent to <strong>the</strong> quantative<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> „objectivity‟.<br />

This study assessed whe<strong>the</strong>r findings were grounded in <strong>the</strong> data by preparing a table<br />

that linked findings to specific interviewees, which confirmed each finding. This table<br />

also included any media interviews as well as <strong>the</strong> interviews conducted in this research<br />

as fur<strong>the</strong>r support for <strong>the</strong> findings. The ethical implications will be discussed in <strong>the</strong><br />

next section.<br />

4.8 Ethical implications<br />

In accordance with <strong>the</strong> ethical guidelines issued by <strong>the</strong> Auckl<strong>and</strong> University <strong>of</strong><br />

Technology‟s Ethics Committee (AUTEC) ethical approval was required because this<br />

research involved human participants. Application was made <strong>and</strong> ethical approval was<br />

granted by AUTEC (Appendix Two). Their reference 08/18 dated 29 February 2008 has<br />

to be included on <strong>the</strong> Informed Consent form (Appendix Four), <strong>the</strong> Participant<br />

Information sheet (Appendix Five) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Transcriber Confidentiality agreement<br />

(Appendix Six). In accordance with <strong>the</strong> ethical principles, privacy <strong>and</strong> confidentiality<br />

have been <strong>and</strong> will continue to be respected throughout this research <strong>and</strong> publication<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!