30.06.2013 Views

Understandability and Transparency of the Financial Statements of ...

Understandability and Transparency of the Financial Statements of ...

Understandability and Transparency of the Financial Statements of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

output <strong>and</strong> input cost ra<strong>the</strong>r meaningless”. Contradicting this was Khumawala <strong>and</strong><br />

Gordon‟s (1997) study whose participants considered that donations were earned, i.e.<br />

matched, when <strong>the</strong> money was used for <strong>the</strong> designated purpose <strong>and</strong> not upon receipt, as<br />

required by GAAP.<br />

The two concerns with <strong>the</strong> accounting basis complexity that this study will investigate<br />

are in relation to, first, <strong>the</strong> certainty <strong>of</strong> receipt, with regards to when to record pledges,<br />

<strong>and</strong> second, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> matching concept is valid for charities. This research will also<br />

determine whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>se two concerns are still occurring in charities <strong>and</strong> ascertain<br />

which accounting basis charities use. If <strong>the</strong> concerns occur in <strong>the</strong> charities, <strong>the</strong> study<br />

will also determine why charities use, or do not use <strong>the</strong> matching concept <strong>and</strong> why <strong>the</strong>y<br />

use <strong>the</strong>ir particular method to record donations <strong>and</strong> pledges, thus determining reasons<br />

for <strong>the</strong>ir actions. Next, <strong>the</strong> complexities around property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment are<br />

identified.<br />

3.2.2 Property, Plant <strong>and</strong> Equipment<br />

Property, plant <strong>and</strong> equipment (PPE) comprise <strong>the</strong> buildings <strong>and</strong> equipment used in a<br />

charity‟s operation (Accounting St<strong>and</strong>ards Committee, 1984) that <strong>the</strong> charity will keep<br />

for longer than twelve months: it is also known as „fixed assets‟. The complexities arise,<br />

with regards to when it is appropriate to record each PPE <strong>and</strong> if recorded whe<strong>the</strong>r PPEs<br />

are depreciated. GAAP will determine when to record <strong>and</strong> depreciate PPE, which will<br />

be looked at next.<br />

3.2.2.1 GAAP<br />

R120 (New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Institute <strong>of</strong> Chartered Accountants, 1999) states that <strong>the</strong> initial cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> a fixed asset must be recorded <strong>and</strong> depreciated (paragraph 5.8). For PPE that are<br />

donated, <strong>the</strong>ir value should be fair value, but how fair value is ascertained is not<br />

detailed. The NFPFRG (New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Institute <strong>of</strong> Chartered Accountants, 2007a) has<br />

similar requirements (paragraph 4.79) but stipulates that <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> PPE should be<br />

reviewed regularly to ensure <strong>the</strong> value has not been impaired (paragraph 4.83), which<br />

specifically relates to New Zeal<strong>and</strong> International Accounting St<strong>and</strong>ard (NZ IAS) 36<br />

Impairment (New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Institute <strong>of</strong> Chartered Accountants, 2006). With regards to<br />

donated PPE, as with <strong>the</strong> R120, <strong>the</strong> NFPFRG determines valuation at fair value. This is<br />

stipulated in NZ IAS 16 paragraph 15.1 (New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Institute <strong>of</strong> Chartered<br />

Accountants, 2004b). NZ IAS 16 paragraph 6 defines fair value as “<strong>the</strong> amount for<br />

which an asset could be exchanged between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm‟s<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!