30.06.2013 Views

Understandability and Transparency of the Financial Statements of ...

Understandability and Transparency of the Financial Statements of ...

Understandability and Transparency of the Financial Statements of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The September 2009 review <strong>of</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong>‟s financial reporting framework, raised <strong>the</strong><br />

importance <strong>of</strong> considering what is <strong>the</strong> most appropriate „assurance engagement‟.<br />

NZICA‟s (2010) Explanatory Foreword to Engagement St<strong>and</strong>ards in paragraph 12<br />

defines an assurance engagement where a conclusion is expressed:<br />

In <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> an opinion designed to enhance <strong>the</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> confidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

intended users o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> responsible party about <strong>the</strong> outcome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

evaluation or measurement <strong>of</strong> a subject matter against criteria.<br />

The Ministry <strong>of</strong> Economic Development (2009d) proposed that charities that are<br />

publicly accountable, i.e. collect money from <strong>the</strong> public, should be required to complete<br />

an assurance engagement unless <strong>the</strong>ir small size means that <strong>the</strong> assurance-related<br />

benefits to users are likely to be outweighed by <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> a review engagement. The<br />

Accounting St<strong>and</strong>ards Review Board‟s tentative proposal (Table 5-3) is that in order to<br />

match costs <strong>and</strong> benefits Tiers 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 would be required to obtain an audit engagement,<br />

but Tier 3 would be able to have a review (Accounting St<strong>and</strong>ards Review Board, 2009).<br />

Tiers Based Upon Operating Expenditure<br />

Tier 1:<br />

Quality assurance proposed<br />

Expenditure ≥NZD10 million.<br />

Tier 2:<br />

Audit<br />

Expenditure<br />

million.<br />

Tier 3:<br />

NZD10 million but ≥NZD1 Audit<br />

Expenditure NZD1 million but Review if expenditure ≥NZD100,000 <strong>and</strong><br />

≥NZD20,000.<br />

Below Tier 3:<br />

NZD1 million.<br />

No audit or review if expenditure $100,000<br />

Expenditure<br />

NZD20,000<br />

equal to or Less than No assurance required<br />

Table 5-3 Levels <strong>of</strong> assurance (Cordery & Sinclair, 2009)<br />

In Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Wales charities must be audited if ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>ir gross income exceeds<br />

GBP500,000 (i.e. NZD2.8 million) or <strong>the</strong>ir assets exceed GBP2.8 million (i.e. NZD5.7<br />

million) (Charity Commission, 2008c). The Auditing Practices Board also <strong>of</strong>fers<br />

specific guidance for auditors <strong>of</strong> charities to aid <strong>the</strong>m in <strong>the</strong>ir audit (Auditing Practices<br />

Board, 2009).<br />

In contrast, Australia does not have a prescribed level <strong>of</strong> auditing for charities. The<br />

determination <strong>of</strong> whe<strong>the</strong>r an audit is required depends upon <strong>the</strong> legal structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

charity, <strong>the</strong> two main ones being incorporated associations <strong>and</strong> company limited by<br />

guarantee. Incorporated associations are governed by <strong>the</strong> Associations Incorporation<br />

Act in <strong>the</strong>ir state <strong>of</strong> incorporation <strong>and</strong>, except in <strong>the</strong> states <strong>of</strong> New South Wales <strong>and</strong><br />

114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!