30.06.2013 Views

Understandability and Transparency of the Financial Statements of ...

Understandability and Transparency of the Financial Statements of ...

Understandability and Transparency of the Financial Statements of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

subset <strong>of</strong> good accountability practice or even a category <strong>of</strong> accountability. This is<br />

illustrated by <strong>the</strong> European Foundation Centre <strong>and</strong> Council on Foundations (2007) who<br />

consider good governance as one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nine accountability practices needed for good<br />

international philanthropy. This is also seen in Fishman‟s (2007) definition <strong>of</strong><br />

accountability which encompasses six different aspects including good governance.<br />

Governance as a subset <strong>of</strong> accountability is also evident in Keating & Frumkin‟s (2003)<br />

<strong>and</strong> Flack & Ryan‟s (2004) definitions <strong>of</strong> accountability.<br />

Hence, governance is seen as an integral part <strong>of</strong> accountability, for without it charities<br />

will not maintain <strong>the</strong> confidence <strong>and</strong> financial support <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> public (Palmer & R<strong>and</strong>all,<br />

2002). Next, how <strong>the</strong> different concepts <strong>of</strong> accountability are analysed in this research<br />

will be considered.<br />

5.6 Concepts <strong>of</strong> accountability<br />

In this research <strong>the</strong> focus is on <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical nature <strong>of</strong> accountability as it relates to<br />

charities, which was discussed in section 5.2 however, some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> common concepts <strong>of</strong><br />

accountability used recently in studies <strong>of</strong> charities conceptualise <strong>the</strong> different concepts<br />

<strong>of</strong> accountability, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir inclusion in this research needs to be considered (Adams,<br />

2004; Agyemang et al., 2009; Ahmed & Wickramsinghe, 2009; Association <strong>of</strong><br />

Chartered Certified Accountants, 2006; Connolly & Dhanani, 2009; Connolly &<br />

Hyndman, 2003; Cordery, 2008; Cordery & Baskerville, 2005; Dellaportas et al., 2008;<br />

Dhanani, 2009; Flack & Ryan, 2004; Hyndman & McDonnell, 2009; International<br />

Federation <strong>of</strong> Accountants, 2008; Jayasinghe & Soobaroyen, 2009; Keating & Frumkin,<br />

2003; Lindkvist & Llewellyn, 2003; Messner, 2009; Narayan, 2006; O'Dwyer &<br />

Unerman, 2008; Steccolini, 2004; Stewart, 1984).<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concepts <strong>of</strong> accountability highlighted in Table 5-4 are interchangeable <strong>and</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs overlap, so <strong>the</strong>ir use in this research needs to be clearly articulated. Stewart<br />

(1984) suggests that concepts <strong>of</strong> accountability can be set out as a „ladder <strong>of</strong><br />

accountability‟ ranging from accountability by st<strong>and</strong>ards to accountability by<br />

judgement.<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!