30.06.2013 Views

Understandability and Transparency of the Financial Statements of ...

Understandability and Transparency of the Financial Statements of ...

Understandability and Transparency of the Financial Statements of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

statements are transparent <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>able to <strong>the</strong>ir users. The rationale for <strong>the</strong><br />

research methodology is discussed next.<br />

4.3 Methodological approach<br />

The methodological approach <strong>of</strong> any research influences <strong>the</strong> basis upon which data is<br />

collected, analysed <strong>and</strong> evaluated. The following section discusses <strong>the</strong> naturalistic<br />

inquiry approach to research, <strong>and</strong> its appropriateness as <strong>the</strong> methodological framework<br />

for <strong>the</strong> present research.<br />

The present study is a qualitative inquiry into <strong>the</strong> accounting methods charities in New<br />

Zeal<strong>and</strong> use with regards to: determining <strong>the</strong> accounting basis; recording property, plant<br />

<strong>and</strong> equipment; recording funds; <strong>and</strong> accounting for <strong>the</strong> expenditure overheads ratio.<br />

The qualitative inquiry seeks to gain a deeper underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> research moving<br />

from what accounting methods charities use to why charities use those methods (Hill &<br />

McGowan, 1999). Of particular relevance to this study is <strong>the</strong> naturalistic paradigm,<br />

which is in line with <strong>the</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> this study to underst<strong>and</strong> reasons charities act as <strong>the</strong>y do<br />

in <strong>the</strong>ir natural setting in order to present reality as it is (Grimwood & Tomkins, 1986).<br />

Lincoln <strong>and</strong> Guba (1985) consider that <strong>the</strong>re are five basic beliefs, or axioms with<br />

naturalistic inquiry. Table 4-1 gives an overview <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se five axioms relating to a<br />

naturalistic paradigm after which an analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> meaning <strong>of</strong> each axiom <strong>and</strong> its<br />

relevance for this research will be analysed to support <strong>the</strong> naturalistic inquiry approach<br />

followed in this research.<br />

Axioms Naturalist Paradigm<br />

1 The nature <strong>of</strong> reality (ontology) Realities are multiple, constructed, <strong>and</strong><br />

holistic.<br />

2 The relationship <strong>of</strong> knower to Knower <strong>and</strong> known are interactive <strong>and</strong><br />

known (epistemology)<br />

inseparable.<br />

3 The possibility <strong>of</strong> generalisation Only time- <strong>and</strong> context-bound idiographic<br />

statements are possible.<br />

4 The possibility <strong>of</strong> causal linkages All entities are in a state <strong>of</strong> mutual<br />

simultaneous shaping, so that it is impossible<br />

to distinguish causes from effects.<br />

5 The role <strong>of</strong> values in inquiry<br />

(axiology)<br />

Inquiry is value-bound.<br />

Table 4-1 Naturalistic Axioms (Lincoln & Guba, 1985, p. 37)<br />

4.3.1 Axiom 1 - The nature <strong>of</strong> reality<br />

Ontology is a branch <strong>of</strong> philosophy concerned with <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> „being‟. Scapens &<br />

Yang consider (2008) that ontology has two aspects. First, <strong>the</strong> „modes <strong>of</strong> existence‟, i.e.<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!