30.06.2013 Views

Understandability and Transparency of the Financial Statements of ...

Understandability and Transparency of the Financial Statements of ...

Understandability and Transparency of the Financial Statements of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Palmer & R<strong>and</strong>all (2002) summarise several codes <strong>of</strong> good practice into eight<br />

dimensions: (1) Effectiveness; (2) Accountability; (3) St<strong>and</strong>ards; (4) User involvement;<br />

(5) Governance; (6) Volunteers; (7) Equality <strong>and</strong> fairness; <strong>and</strong> (8) Staff management.<br />

Here, accountability <strong>and</strong> governance co-exist as two separate parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole picture<br />

<strong>of</strong> good practice.<br />

Palmer & R<strong>and</strong>all (2002, p. 31) define accountability as “evaluating effectiveness <strong>and</strong><br />

performance, dealing with complaints fairly <strong>and</strong> communicating to all stakeholders<br />

whose responsibility will be fulfilled” whereas <strong>the</strong>y define governance as “having a<br />

systematic <strong>and</strong> open process for making appointments to <strong>the</strong> governing body, setting out<br />

<strong>the</strong> roles <strong>and</strong> responsibilities <strong>of</strong> members”. Palmer & R<strong>and</strong>all‟s (2002) definition <strong>of</strong><br />

governance is quite narrow <strong>and</strong> appears to focus on <strong>the</strong> appointments to charities<br />

governing bodies <strong>and</strong> ensuring those appointed are clear on <strong>the</strong>ir responsibilities.<br />

By contrast, ano<strong>the</strong>r view <strong>of</strong> governance, as shown in Figure 5-1, has two dimensions:<br />

conformance, <strong>and</strong> performance where accountability is a subset <strong>of</strong> conformance<br />

(International Federation <strong>of</strong> Accountants, 2009b). However, IFAC (2009b, p. 19) also<br />

considers that <strong>the</strong> principles <strong>of</strong>: integrity; accountability; <strong>and</strong> transparency govern <strong>the</strong><br />

processes involved with providing information to upward stakeholders. This repositions<br />

accountability as part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole organisation ra<strong>the</strong>r than a subset <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> conformance<br />

dimension. This viewpoint is implicitly supported by IFAC, <strong>of</strong>fering two definitions <strong>of</strong><br />

accountability. First, a narrow focus <strong>of</strong> accountability as <strong>the</strong> responsibility to<br />

stakeholders, i.e. part <strong>of</strong> conformance; <strong>and</strong> second, a wider view <strong>of</strong> accountability as <strong>the</strong><br />

process whereby entities are:<br />

Responsible for <strong>the</strong>ir decisions <strong>and</strong> actions, including <strong>the</strong>ir stewardship <strong>of</strong><br />

public funds <strong>and</strong> all aspects <strong>of</strong> performance; <strong>and</strong> submit <strong>the</strong>mselves to<br />

appropriate external scrutiny (International Federation <strong>of</strong> Accountants, 2009b,<br />

p. 20).<br />

Figure 5-1 Governance Framework (IFAC, 2009)<br />

Research (Eisenberg, 2008; Fishman, 2007; Flack & Ryan, 2004; Keating & Frumkin,<br />

2003) focused on charities <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> wider NFP sector tend to look at governance as a<br />

120

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!