30.06.2013 Views

Understandability and Transparency of the Financial Statements of ...

Understandability and Transparency of the Financial Statements of ...

Understandability and Transparency of the Financial Statements of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The important aspect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposed performance framework is that all three facets are<br />

needed, i.e. outcomes, financial viability <strong>and</strong> outputs. As can be seen from <strong>the</strong><br />

Afghanistan <strong>and</strong> East Timor examples, charities may be financially healthy but that<br />

doesn‟t necessarily mean <strong>the</strong>ir donations are being spent wisely to aid <strong>the</strong> beneficiaries<br />

(Social Solutions, 2009).<br />

Finally, <strong>the</strong> possible future impacts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposed performance framework will be<br />

considered, including <strong>the</strong> potential impacts on funders <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> need for rating agencies<br />

to interpret <strong>the</strong> additional information provided by charities.<br />

8.4 Possible future impacts<br />

The possible future impacts <strong>of</strong> a broadening <strong>of</strong> performance accountability to<br />

encompass both output, outcomes <strong>and</strong> financial viability reporting could see many<br />

impacts. This includes <strong>the</strong> impact on funders‟ reporting requirements <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> need for<br />

<strong>the</strong> Charities Commission to adjust its Annual Return form to better reflect <strong>the</strong> impact<br />

<strong>the</strong> charity has had on its beneficiaries. There may also be a need for rating agencies to<br />

interpret all <strong>the</strong> information for donors to enable <strong>the</strong>m to make an informed decision.<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r potential impacts could be a broadening <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Charities Commission‟s<br />

registration requirements beyond <strong>the</strong> current focus on whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> organisation has a<br />

charitable purpose, to one <strong>of</strong> sustainability. However, <strong>the</strong> success <strong>of</strong> any proposed<br />

broadening <strong>of</strong> performance accountability will only be possible if <strong>the</strong>re is uniformity in<br />

measurement. Prescribed performance reporting st<strong>and</strong>ards will be necessary to achieve<br />

this. First this section will look at funders‟ current <strong>and</strong> potential future reporting<br />

requirements.<br />

8.4.1 Funders<br />

As discussed in Chapter Two section 2.6.3, <strong>the</strong>re is a wide variety <strong>of</strong> funders, both<br />

governmental <strong>and</strong> non-governmental, providing funding to New Zeal<strong>and</strong> charities. This<br />

section looks first at <strong>the</strong> current reporting requirements <strong>of</strong> funders to <strong>the</strong> charities <strong>the</strong>y<br />

fund. For <strong>the</strong> broadening <strong>of</strong> performance accountability to be successful <strong>the</strong>re is a need<br />

for funders to broaden <strong>the</strong>ir future reporting requirements to incorporate <strong>the</strong> three facets<br />

<strong>of</strong> future performance accountability. First, funders‟ current reporting requirements are<br />

considered.<br />

197

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!