Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
H e n r i L e F e b v r e<br />
nearby, competing with their neighbors to hustle some action—a<br />
new office tower here, a new mall there, rich flâneurs downtown,<br />
affluent residents uptown.<br />
Industrialization has commodified the city, set in motion the<br />
decentering the city, created cleavages at work and in everyday<br />
life: “Expelled from the city,” <strong>Lefebvre</strong> writes, “the proletariat will<br />
lose its sense of œuvre. Dispensable from their peripheral enclaves<br />
for dispersed enterprises, the proletariat lets its own conscious creative<br />
capacity dim. Urban consciousness vanishes” (p. 77). “Only<br />
now,” reckoned <strong>Lefebvre</strong> in the 1960s, “are we beginning to grasp<br />
the specificity of the city” (p. 100), a product of society and of<br />
social relations yet a special feature within those relations. Indeed,<br />
urbanization now reacts back on society, for better or for worse,<br />
and has run ahead of industrialization itself. It’s only now, he adds,<br />
using his own emphases, that the “foremost theoretical problem<br />
can be formulated”: “For the working class, victim of segregation<br />
and expelled from the traditional city, deprived of a present and<br />
possible urban life, a practical problem poses itself, a political one,<br />
even if it hasn’t been posed politically, and even if until now the<br />
housing question … has masked the problematic of the city and<br />
the urban” (p. 100).<br />
The latter allusion, of course, is to Engels’s famous pamphlet<br />
The Housing Question (1872), in which Marx’s faithful collaborator<br />
denounced those petty-bourgeois reformists who wanted to<br />
resolve squalid worker housing conditions without resolving the<br />
squalid social relations underwriting them. While <strong>Lefebvre</strong>, a fellow<br />
Marxist, concurs with Engels’s analysis and critique, as well<br />
as with his political reasoning, he can’t, circa late twentieth century,<br />
adhere to Engels’s solution:<br />
The giant metropolis will disappear. It should disappear.<br />
Engels possessed this idea in his youth and never let it go. In<br />
The Housing Question, he’d already anticipated, “supposing<br />
the abolition of the capitalist mode of production,” an equal<br />
70