02.07.2013 Views

Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

s p o n t a n e i t y<br />

Molotov cocktails, and manned the barricades. On May 13, there<br />

was a one-day general strike; “student–worker” solidarity suddenly<br />

looked possible, against the French Communist Party’s and<br />

general worker’s union’s odds. By May 20, strikes and occupations<br />

became contagious. Nationwide, around ten million workers<br />

downed tools and froze assembly lines. France seemed on the<br />

precipice of revolution; a festival of people was glimpsed, briefly.<br />

<strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s double allegiance with the students and the working<br />

class meant his Marxist take on May 1968 was at once orthodox<br />

and heterodox, rooted in the “objective conditions” of French postwar<br />

society, conditions expressive of economic contradictions and<br />

crisis tendencies in long waves of growth; on the other hand, he<br />

was equally sympathetic to the “specific” and “subjective” grievances<br />

of the youth: their alienation, their hatred of institutions,<br />

their loathing of the admen and technocrats plotting to commodify<br />

the world. (They were also voicing discontent over an all-toopersistent<br />

theme: an illegal war in a far-off place perpetrated by<br />

American military might.) In essence, the wily <strong>Lefebvre</strong> wanted<br />

to highlight what was simultaneously general and specific about<br />

this latest “French Revolution,” what was objective and subjective,<br />

structural and superstructural, old and new in the situation.<br />

He wanted to grasp everything dialectically and explain things in<br />

their totality. He yearned, above all, for young and old progressives<br />

to dialogue around theory and action.<br />

When I first read The Explosion in the late 1980s, it hadn’t<br />

turned me on much. Doubtless the prevailing political climate<br />

hardly helped. After all, my friends and I, like much of the British<br />

left, were then afflicted with New Right blues, or were languid<br />

with the melancholy of postmodernism. A decade or more on, a<br />

few things had changed, some for the better! To begin with, the din<br />

around postmodernism had subsided: nowadays, the intellectual<br />

left isn’t so much bothered about deconstructing Los Angeles’s<br />

Bonaventure Hotel as a postmodern hyperspace as it is supporting<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!