Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
G L o b a L i z a t i o n a n d t H e s t a t e<br />
is necessary to struggle at all costs. There is no ‘good state’; today<br />
there is no state that can avoid moving towards this logical outcome:<br />
the State Mode of Production; that’s why the only criterion<br />
of democracy is the prevention of such an outcome.” 6<br />
Lurking behind this new state form, behind a “simulacrum<br />
of decentralization,” is thus a right-wing Hegelian “ruse of reason.”<br />
The neoliberal state’s divestment from the public sphere in<br />
the name of personal liberty—epitomized by Margaret Thatcher’s<br />
1980s maxim “There is no such thing as society, only individuals<br />
and families”—“merely transferred the problems,” <strong>Lefebvre</strong> reckons,<br />
“but not the privileges.” 7 No longer is government coughing<br />
up for public service provision and collective consumption budgets;<br />
instead it subsidized corporate enterprise, lubricated private<br />
investment into “the secondary circuit of capital,” and left it to<br />
grassroots groups and voluntary organizations to clear up the mess<br />
of market failure, to handle affairs of redistributive justice.<br />
The loosening or breaking down of the state’s centralized<br />
administration, its apparent rolling back and strengthening of civil<br />
society, is really “the crushing of the social between the economic<br />
and the political.” 8 Privatization and deregulation actually extend<br />
the domain of the state rather than restrict it. From being outside of<br />
civil society, the state henceforth suffuses all civil society. “If the<br />
state occupies three dominant sectors (energy, information technology,<br />
and links with national and world markets),” <strong>Lefebvre</strong> cautions,<br />
“it can loosen its reins somewhat towards subordinate units,<br />
regions and cities, as well as business … it can control everything<br />
without needing to monitor everything.” 9<br />
* * *<br />
Abstract space and SMP orthodoxy have proliferated most forcefully<br />
in the post-1991 era. So forcefully, in fact, that the dialectical<br />
link between space and politics seems to have receded behind<br />
125