Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
M y s t i F i e d c o n s c i o U s n e s s<br />
when reification is everywhere, when God is on the comeback<br />
and wacky fundamentalist values are writ large, a healthy dose of<br />
<strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s Nietzschean skepticism strikes as piquant—and necessary.<br />
Nietzschean free spirits are fearless, strong, and secular;<br />
they don’t relinquish anything to institutions or higher powers, to<br />
faith or morality. They signify the “twilight of the idols” and bid<br />
farewell “to the coldest of cold monsters.”<br />
“The coldest of cold monsters” was Nietzsche’s label for the<br />
state from Thus Spoke Zarathustra (see “On the New Idols”). The<br />
Bush administration wasn’t Nietzsche’s target, but it could easily<br />
have been: “the state lies in all the tongues of good and evil;<br />
and whatever it says it lies—and whatever it has it has stolen. …<br />
Coldly, it tells lies; and this lie crawls out of its mouth: ‘I, the state,<br />
am the people.’ … Behold, how it lures them, the all-too-many—<br />
and how it devours them, chews them … thus roars the monster.” 32<br />
Yet Nietzschean intellectuals don’t hang around to suffocate in the<br />
stench: they break windows and leap into the open air. “The earth<br />
is free even now for great souls,” says Nietzsche. “A free life is still<br />
free for great souls. … Only where the state ends, there begins the<br />
human being who is not superfluous. … Where the state ends—<br />
look there, my brothers! Do you not see it, the rainbow and the<br />
bridges of the superman?” 33<br />
Being drawn to Marx and Nietzsche, <strong>Lefebvre</strong> hints in La<br />
Somme et le Reste, is a push-pull affair, a restless shifting between<br />
two poles, defined by will and prevailing politics. Some combination<br />
of Nietzsche and Marx can reveal a lot about the world<br />
outside and inside our heads. It’s a complex connection, a veritable<br />
dialectic that dramatizes a creative tension: it seems a<br />
potentially fruitful combination unifying private consciousness<br />
and social consciousness. Rooting for Marx and Nietzsche is to<br />
support negativity, is to posit the power of the negative, to rally<br />
around it. Negating the present; overcoming the past; reaching<br />
out for the future; destroying idols, cold monsters—that’s Marx’s<br />
157