Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
H e n r i L e F e b v r e<br />
“turbo-Prof,” a species of French academic who teaches in the<br />
provinces, who catches the train à grande vitesse (TGV) every<br />
Monday morning and Thursday afternoon, yet keeps a primary<br />
residence in the nation’s capital. (<strong>Lefebvre</strong> lived at rue Rambuteau<br />
in the 3rd arrondissement, first in an apartment at number 24, and<br />
later at number 30. Both buildings were close to the old Les Halles<br />
market halls, architectural jewels destined to be demolished in<br />
1969 to make way for the RER rapid computer train line—which<br />
would ironically speed to Nanterre. In 1977, the dreaded Pompidou<br />
Centre became <strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s unwelcome, upscale neighbor. He could<br />
almost spit at it from his front window.) 1<br />
“Around 1960,” <strong>Lefebvre</strong> reflects in Everyday Life in the<br />
Modern World (1968), “the situation became clearer.” Everyday<br />
life was “no longer the no-man’s land, the poor relation of specialized<br />
activities. In France and elsewhere, neo-capitalist leaders had<br />
become aware of the fact that colonies were more trouble than they<br />
were worth and there was a change of strategy; new vistas opened<br />
out such as investments in national territories and the organization<br />
of home trade.” 2 The net result, <strong>Lefebvre</strong> thinks, was that “all areas<br />
outside the centers of political decision making and economic concentration<br />
of capital were considered as semi-colonies and exploited<br />
as such; these included the suburbs of cities, the countryside, zones<br />
of agricultural production and all outlying districts inhabited,<br />
needless to say, by employees, technicians and manual laborers;<br />
thus the state of the proletarian became generalized, leading to a<br />
blurring of class distinctions and ideological ‘values.’ ” 3 Work life,<br />
private life, and leisure were “rationally” exploited, cut up, laid<br />
out, and put back together again, timetabled and monitored by the<br />
assorted bureaucracies, corporations, and technocracies.<br />
Massive scientific and technological revolutions became a<br />
perverse inversion of—and substitute for—the social and political<br />
revolution that never materialized. That was like waiting for<br />
Godot. (“We’ll hang ourselves tomorrow. [Pause.] Unless Godot<br />
22