02.07.2013 Views

Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

p r e F a c e<br />

each morning in an apartment along the rue de la Santé. He let<br />

everything rip, loosened every shackle. He was about to quit the<br />

Communist Party, to expel himself, departing from the left wing.<br />

(J’ai quitté le Parti par la gauche,” he enjoyed bragging.) Stalin’s<br />

misdeeds were now public; the 1956 Soviet invasion of Hungary<br />

had disgusted many communists, <strong>Lefebvre</strong> included. This was<br />

<strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s heart laid bare, his settling of accounts—with the party<br />

and with Stalinism—his “inventory” of the epoch: personal reminiscences<br />

and stinging rebuttals, historical and political analyses,<br />

literary set pieces, poems that hint of Rimbaud and Mallarmé,<br />

portraits of friends and pillories of enemies, all laced with dense<br />

philosophical disquisitions and Marxist delineations.<br />

It was a lyrical and romantic “confession,” revealing the<br />

struggles and delights of a life in philosophy as well as the pitfalls<br />

befalling a philosopher in life. The spirit of Rousseau seems close<br />

by; yet we also suspect <strong>Lefebvre</strong> remembers Dostoevsky’s underground<br />

man’s warning: vanity will always force men to fictionalize<br />

themselves. Few scholars nowadays could match <strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s<br />

prosaic powers and grip on his times. Fewer still could ever dream<br />

up such an idiosyncratic book. <strong>Lefebvre</strong> is so passionately engaged<br />

with what was going on around him, and inside him, that, like the<br />

“Wedding-Guest” from Coleridge’s “Ancient Mariner,” we cannot<br />

choose but hear. Writing it was clearly therapeutic, a Proustian<br />

moment, reclaiming lost time and space: “This book,” he wrote<br />

in 1973, in an updated preface, “speaks of deliverance, of happiness<br />

regained. Liberated from political pressure as one exits from<br />

a place of suffocation, a man starts to live, and to think. After a<br />

long, long period of asphyxiation, of delusion, of disappointments<br />

concealed … look at him: he crawls up from the abyss. Curious<br />

animal. He surges from the depths, surfaces, a little flattened by<br />

heavy pressures. He breathes in the sunshine, opens himself, displays<br />

himself, comes alive again.” 9<br />

xxiii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!