Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
H e n r i L e F e b v r e<br />
history, from the ancient Greeks to the Middle Ages, the city,<br />
<strong>Lefebvre</strong> points out, was once an inspiring organic unity, intimately<br />
bonded with the countryside; the two realms coexisted in a<br />
delicate but real symbiosis. Now, this symbiosis, this organic unity<br />
has been undone, dismembered, dislocated. 3 Both the city and the<br />
countryside are victims of the inexorable drive to accumulate capital,<br />
a drive orchestrated by assorted agents and agencies of the<br />
capitalist state. Everyday life had become at once colonized, fragmented,<br />
and politicized. Once, in Greek times, with its dynamic<br />
public-square agoras, the polis epitomized the very essence of civil<br />
society in harmony with the state. “The state coincided with the<br />
city and civil society,” <strong>Lefebvre</strong> says, “to form a polycentric whole,<br />
and private life was subservient to it.” 4 It wasn’t until the “modern<br />
world,” as the young Marx highlighted, that the abstraction of the<br />
state and the abstraction of private life were born. 5 Marx used the<br />
term modern to periodize the rise of the bourgeoisie, the development<br />
of industrial growth, and the “real subsumption” of modern<br />
capitalist production. Between 1840 and 1845, Marx pinpointed, in<br />
effect, the birth of modern modernity. The type of the state Marx<br />
defined, <strong>Lefebvre</strong> explains, “is one which separates everyday life<br />
(private life) from social life and political life. … As a result, private<br />
life and the state—that is, political life—fall simultaneously<br />
into identical but conflicting abstractions” (p. 170).<br />
For <strong>Lefebvre</strong>, Mourenx demonstrates how fragmentation and<br />
conflicting abstractions materialize themselves in bricks and mortar—and<br />
in plastic. In modern everyday life, streets and highways<br />
are more and more necessary to physically connect people, “but<br />
their incessant unchanging, ever-repeated traffic is turning [human<br />
space] into wastelands” (p. 121). Everything seems topsy-turvy:<br />
“Retail is becoming more important than production, exchange<br />
more important than activity, intermediaries more important than<br />
makers, means more important than ends” (p. 121). Strangely,<br />
there aren’t many traffic lights in Mourenx, even though the<br />
62