Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
H e n r i L e F e b v r e<br />
of communication and publicity open everything up to “the eyes of<br />
the global poor”—adapting Baudelaire’s poem—inspiring indignation<br />
and organization as well as awe (“big saucers eyes”), prompting<br />
the “world literature” Marx dreamed of in The Communist<br />
Manifesto? Tens of thousands of poor landless Latinos have<br />
already helped reinvent the urban labor movement in California;<br />
militancy in South African townships brought down Apartheid;<br />
millions took to the streets in Jakarta, Seoul, Bangkok, São Paulo,<br />
and Buena Aires, when East Asian and Latin American economies<br />
went into meltdown during 1997; revolts against the International<br />
Monetary Fund shock therapy programs have regularly left many<br />
developing world capitals smoldering as the most vulnerable connect<br />
the global with the local on the street. Examples abound. The<br />
fault line between the internationalization of the economy and<br />
a marginalization of everyday life scars urban space. The urban<br />
scale is the key mediator on the global scene, at once the stake and<br />
terrain of social struggle, both launch pad and linchpin in history.<br />
The urban revolution from below, as a historic bloc—or seismic<br />
tremor—still remains the “virtual object” <strong>Lefebvre</strong> described in<br />
1970, a future scenario yet to be established. But if it ever becomes<br />
a “real” object, a directly lived reality, insurgency will look a lot<br />
different from 1968 and 1871, and from 1917: the storming of the<br />
Winter Palace will now come in the monsoon season.<br />
* * *<br />
The Urban Revolution intimates the shape of things to come, in<br />
terms of both <strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s political desires and his scholarly œuvre.<br />
As ever, one project prompted another, one thesis led him to an<br />
antithesis and consequently to a higher thesis, something to be<br />
confirmed, tested out, negated again. His life and work ceaselessly<br />
moved through this dialectical process of affirmation and negation,<br />
thesis and antithesis and synthesis. In one footnote, buried<br />
96