Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
e v e r y d a y L i F e<br />
wrote “easy poetry” and “clear prose.” 35 The Abbey of Thélème<br />
even seemed to anticipate the young Marx’s radiant vision: a “communist<br />
utopia that opened itself resolutely towards the future. It proposed<br />
an image of man fully developed, in a free society. At the<br />
same time, Rabelais knows he’s dreaming, because this society is<br />
headed towards terrible ordeals and chronic catastrophes.” 36<br />
<strong>Lefebvre</strong> himself stepped into Rabelais’s unfettered world of<br />
excess, affirming throughout his life his own free will in everyday<br />
life—for better or for worse. He willfully ignored abstinence<br />
and austerity, as well as a plebeian asceticism that informed a lot<br />
of his generation’s visions of Marxism and communism. All the<br />
same, there was a flip side to <strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s Rabelaisian nature, something<br />
not entirely positive; not least was his excessive publication<br />
(writing books at a rate that the most prolific wrote articles) and<br />
his excessive libido (like Rabelais’s vagabond hero Panurge, extricated<br />
from all social and familial ties, <strong>Lefebvre</strong> seemed obsessed<br />
with a search for women and had a penchant for marriage). Indeed,<br />
<strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s Rabelaisian excesses make his output effervescent<br />
and vital yet repetitive and overblown, like a drunk who repeats<br />
the same old joke to the same cronies every night at the bar. It<br />
was excess, too, that made much of <strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s personal life chaotic,<br />
leaving ex-partners and ex-wives to pick up the pieces of a<br />
Lefebvrian personal liberty.<br />
Still, excess became a redoubtable political force, and the most<br />
magical, supreme, and excessive event Rabelais documented—the<br />
peasant festival—enacted a joyous, primal kind of liberty that<br />
<strong>Lefebvre</strong> would never renounce, either personally or politically.<br />
He envisages the festival as a special, potentially modern form of<br />
Marxist praxis that could erupt on an urban street or in an alienated<br />
factory. The festival was a pure spontaneous moment, a popular<br />
“safety value”, a catharsis for everyday passions and dreams,<br />
something both liberating and antithetical: to papal infallibility<br />
and Stalinist dogma, to Hitlerism and free-market earnestness, to<br />
17