Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
H e n r i L e F e b v r e<br />
and Nietzsche’s clarion call, just as it was <strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s. And didn’t<br />
Hegel suggest in The Phenomenology of Spirit that “the supreme<br />
power of being” came from “looking the negative in the face and<br />
living with it”? Power, of course, is upfront and very explicit in<br />
Nietzsche’s œuvre; in Marx’s it’s implicit almost everywhere. His<br />
parable at the beginning of “The Working Day” chapter of Capital<br />
has a surprisingly Nietzschean conception of power, something<br />
not lost on <strong>Lefebvre</strong>.<br />
“The capitalist maintains his rights as a purchaser when he<br />
tries to make the working day as long as possible,” writes Marx,<br />
“and, where possible, to make two working days out of one. On<br />
the other hand, the peculiar nature of the commodity sold implies<br />
a limit to its consumption by the purchaser, and the worker maintains<br />
his right as a seller when he wishes to reduce the working day<br />
to a particular normal length.” 34 Marx’s verdict on the resolution<br />
strengthens his allegiance with Nietzsche: “There is here therefore<br />
an antimony of right against right and between equal rights force<br />
decides. Hence is it that in the history of capitalist production, the<br />
determination of what is a working day presents itself as a result<br />
of a struggle, a struggle between collective capital, i.e., the class<br />
of capitalists, and collective labor, i.e., the working class.” Those<br />
who win, in other words, those who are the victors in political contestation,<br />
thereby decide what a “just” working day might be, in a<br />
principle that not only holds at the workplace but pervades every<br />
aspect of social, political, and legal life under capitalism.<br />
In this clash of rights, Marx cautions, there’s no absolute truth<br />
“out there” waiting to be discovered, no “universal” morality to be<br />
invoked to separate good from evil, right from wrong. Instead, his<br />
notion of truth mimics Nietzsche’s “perspectival” notion of truth:<br />
it presents itself as a relative creation, as a clash of perspectives<br />
whose outcome emerges through struggle, through the implementation<br />
of force and power. In The Will to Power, Nietzsche said<br />
(section 534), “The criterion of truth resides in the enchantment<br />
15