Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
G L o b a L i z a t i o n a n d t H e s t a t e<br />
early driving force behind such politicization; economic, administrative,<br />
and military organization got inscribed in parts of the<br />
world once unique, once outside centers of power and domination.<br />
At that moment, abstract space took over from historical space,<br />
setting in motion a new historical and geographical dynamic.<br />
In its birth pangs, Marx called this impulse “primitive accumulation”;<br />
in The Production of Space, <strong>Lefebvre</strong> gives it an<br />
explicit spatial dynamic. “The forces of history smashed naturalness<br />
forever,” he notes, “and upon its ruins established the space<br />
of accumulation (the accumulation of all wealth and resources:<br />
knowledge, technology, money, precious objects, works of art<br />
and symbols)” (POS, p. 49). What Hardt and Negri identify as<br />
“Empire” is, in reality, the most developed form yet of Lefebvrian<br />
abstract space, and it incarnates the passage from “the capitalist<br />
state” to the SMP, replete with its own biopower: “The state’s management,”<br />
he says in De l’État,<br />
develops its effects in society as a whole; it doesn’t limit itself to<br />
steering society: it modifies society from top to bottom. Political<br />
society engenders social relations; reacting in the breast of civil<br />
society, political society modifies these social relations with a<br />
“determined” orientation: formation, consolidation and reinforcement<br />
of the middle-classes. This process can itself be considered<br />
as a political product, because its relations tend to reproduce<br />
themselves in assuming the general reproduction of social relations<br />
of production and domination. … The state redirects the<br />
reproduction of social relations by diverse means: by repression<br />
and hierarchy, by the production of appropriated (political) space,<br />
in brief, by the management of all aspects of society. 18<br />
The domain of Empire thereby periodizes a sort of neoabstract<br />
space, something even more abstract than heretofore, whose<br />
generative roots hark back to the global crises of the mid-1970s,<br />
to economic and political upheavals triggered by the demise of<br />
Bretton Woods and catalyzed by the 1973 oil embargo. Yet there’s<br />
131