02.07.2013 Views

Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

M y s t i F i e d c o n s c i o U s n e s s<br />

interpretation of Hegel, stressing the social and structural origins<br />

of “unhappy consciousness,” calling for solutions rooted in praxis<br />

not faith. This trajectory was immeasurably aided by another big<br />

formative event for <strong>Lefebvre</strong>: the rediscovery of the Hegelian origins<br />

of Marxism, as evinced with the debut appearance in the early<br />

1930s of Marx’s Paris Manuscripts of 1844. Almost immediately<br />

he and Norbert Guterman began translating and popularizing<br />

Marx’s early writings, extracting them alongside snippets from<br />

Hegel. 10 The duo would drag Hegel closer and closer to Marx and<br />

Marx closer and closer to Hegel. In the process, they’d stake out a<br />

rich, heterodox Hegelian–Marxism in between. “The importance<br />

of Hegel’s Phenomenology,” wrote the young Marx, in a text many<br />

times studied by <strong>Lefebvre</strong>, “and its final result—the dialectic of<br />

negativity as the moving and producing principle—lies in the fact<br />

that Hegel conceives the self-creation of man as a process, [and]<br />

objectification as loss of object, as alienation.” 11<br />

Yet the Hegelian fix to alienation, to unhappy consciousness,<br />

had recourse to the thinking alone, to abstract dialectical logic.<br />

All the drama is in the head; everything is form without any real<br />

content, any real materiality and concrete objectivity. People populate<br />

Hegel’s universe, but, as Marx said, they course around as<br />

mere “forms of consciousness,” as minds without men. Hegel, for<br />

Marx, “turns man into the man of consciousness, instead of turning<br />

consciousness into the consciousness of real men.” As such,<br />

Hegel posited a philosophical history not a philosophy of history.<br />

“This movement of history,” Marx claimed, “is not yet the real<br />

history of man as a given subject.” 12<br />

<strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s originality lies in how he unites Hegel’s unhappy<br />

consciousness with young Marx’s humanist critique. In the mix,<br />

he warned neither individual nor collective forms of consciousness<br />

necessarily represent a criterion of truth: modern consciousness<br />

is a consciousness manipulated by ideology, ideology propagandized<br />

by state power. Different kinds of authority enter into<br />

149

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!