Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
H e n r i L e F e b v r e<br />
idea. There was a drunkenness soon followed by a hangover.” 30<br />
Yet while he partook in the demonstrations and politicking, he distanced<br />
himself from the euphoria, from the frenzied celebrations,<br />
and found a quieter “joie de vivre” with local youth movements,<br />
frolicking, as he notes (pp. 464–65), in Fontainebleau’s forest at<br />
midnight, promenading at dawn near Recloses, sleeping rough<br />
in barns in a short-lived age of innocence. “Everything became<br />
possible. All was permitted,” he writes of this period (p. 464). In<br />
between, he needed his solitude, and Nietzsche became a source of<br />
comfort, something personal rather than intellectual. “Nietzsche<br />
furnished me with a system of defense. … I became a character,<br />
my character” (p. 476).<br />
<strong>Lefebvre</strong> was seduced—and unnerved—by Nietzsche’s poetry,<br />
by his ability to “think in grand, dramatic images, and his cosmic<br />
tendency.” 31 How was it possible that an immense poet, “with a<br />
sonority of a grand organ, was the real ancestor and prophet of<br />
racism and Hitlerian brutality”? How could a thinker who loved<br />
the Old Testament, who went out of his way to express admiration<br />
for Jews and disdain of his German heritage, be appropriated<br />
by the National-Socialists? Why abandon Nietzsche to fascists? It<br />
was time, <strong>Lefebvre</strong> says, for the Popular Front to reclaim him. “It<br />
was also the occasion,” he writes (p. 468), “to say that the political<br />
revolution, even where it might take place, wouldn’t resolve<br />
all the problems of individual life, nor of love and happiness.”<br />
<strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s hot personal bond with Nietzsche also set an example<br />
for Marxists: “why,” <strong>Lefebvre</strong> inquires, “should relations of<br />
Marxists to the works of Marx be so cold, so devoid of passion, so<br />
without warmth, like relations with an object?” (p. 476).<br />
In the mid-1930s, <strong>Lefebvre</strong> propelled a personal bond into a<br />
critical political necessity, into a Nietzschean humanism, a ballast<br />
to an emergent Zeitgeist. With Nietzsche’s aid, he sought to<br />
devalue bourgeois values and invent new values, stronger values,<br />
without God or nation, state, or commodity reification. At a time<br />
156