Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
n o t e s<br />
the Feltrinelli Institute in Milan. I worked for weeks at the Institute; I found<br />
unpublished documentation. I used it, and that’s completely my right.”<br />
“Listen,” insisted <strong>Lefebvre</strong>, “I don’t care at all about these accusations of<br />
plagiarism. And I never took the time to read what they wrote about the<br />
Commune in their journal. I know that I was dragged through the mud.”<br />
Curiously, <strong>Lefebvre</strong> thanks Debord in La Proclamation de la Commune<br />
(p. 11, footnote 1), for his friendship and support “in the course of fecund<br />
and cordial discussions.” But in a typesetting howler (or a <strong>Lefebvre</strong> practical<br />
joke?), Debord is cited as M. Guy Debud!<br />
22. Régis Debray, Revolution in the Revolution? Armed Struggle and<br />
Political Struggle in Latin America (Monthly Review Press, New York,<br />
1967), pp. 76–77.<br />
23. This is a crucial passage in The Urban Revolution. Alas, Minnesota<br />
University Press’s English translation has deflected <strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s original<br />
meaning.<br />
Chapter 6<br />
1. Espace et société, which <strong>Lefebvre</strong> launched with Anatole Kopp and<br />
Anthropos’s blessing, was formative in his spatial turn. Between 1970 and<br />
1980, the journal was a mouthpiece for New Left thinking on cities, space,<br />
and politics, as well as an outlet for a new breed of Young Turk critical<br />
sociologists, economists, and political scientists. (The sociologist Manuel<br />
Castells was a member of the Espace et société collective.) Issue number 1<br />
(November 1970) was inaugurated with <strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s pioneering “Réflexions<br />
sur la politique de l’espace,” an agenda-setting manifesto. “I thus repeat,”<br />
<strong>Lefebvre</strong> wrote, “there is a politics of space because space is political.” The<br />
article was reprinted in <strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s Espace et politique; an English translation<br />
appeared in the radical geography journal Antipode, Espace et société’s<br />
nearest Anglo-Saxon counterpart, spearheaded in the United States by<br />
the geographer Dick Peet. See <strong>Henri</strong> <strong>Lefebvre</strong>, “Reflections on the Politics<br />
of Space,” Antipode 8, no. 2 (1976): 30–37; the piece also featured in Peet’s<br />
handy (and still valuable) edited collection Radical Geography (Maaroufa<br />
Press, New York, 1977).<br />
2. See Remi Hess, “<strong>Henri</strong> <strong>Lefebvre</strong> et la pensée de l’espace,” Avant-Propos<br />
à la quatrième édition française de La production de l’espace (Anthropos,<br />
Paris, 2000), p. xiv.<br />
3. Ibid., pp. xv–xvi.<br />
4. Donald Nicholson-Smith, the translator of The Production of Space, passed<br />
this information on to me in an e-mail exchange, April 21, 2005.<br />
5. Guy Debord, the other Hegelian Marxist theorist, was equally nowhere<br />
on “respectable” Anglo-American theoretical curricula. The Society of the<br />
Spectacle, pirated by Fredy Perlman’s anarchist Black and Red Books in<br />
Detroit and later by London’s Rebel Press, was exclusively fringe-militant<br />
nourishment.<br />
1 3