Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
H e n r i L e F e b v r e<br />
known a tradition that is the veritable nemesis of insurgent forms<br />
of modern alienation: the rural festival. The drama usually ended<br />
in rowdy scuffles and raving orgies; festival days were rough and<br />
tumble and full of vitality, and <strong>Lefebvre</strong> loved them and romanticized<br />
them in adulthood. (Pieter Brueghel’s painting Battle of<br />
Carnival and Lent magnificently portrays this raucous medieval<br />
lifeworld.) Festivals seeped into <strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s Marxist conscience,<br />
activated involuntary memory, and aroused primordial visions of<br />
infant paradise, tasting a little like a Proustian madeleine dipped in<br />
tea; the sensation recreated the past, only to unlock the Pandora’s<br />
box of the future. <strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s philosophical homesickness locates<br />
itself in the future, and the past becomes a platform for pushing<br />
forward, partying onward, toward a higher plane of critical thinking<br />
and practice. He saw in festivals paradigms of an authentic<br />
everyday life, a realm where the shackles of enslavement had been<br />
loosened.<br />
Indeed, festivals “tightened social links,” he says, “and at the<br />
same time gave rein to all the desires which had been pent up<br />
by collective discipline and the necessities of everyday work. In<br />
celebrating, each member of the community went beyond themselves,<br />
so to speak, and in one fell swoop drew all that was energetic,<br />
pleasurable and possible from nature, food, social life and<br />
their own body and mind.” 28 <strong>Lefebvre</strong> invokes the festival during<br />
the 1940s and 1950s as a jarring antithesis of bureaucratic domination<br />
and systematized ordering. Like Faust, he fraternizes with<br />
the demonic and gives himself over to Dionysius, to excess and<br />
unproductivity, to Eros rather than Logos, to desire rather than<br />
depression. Festivals were like everyday life, only more intense,<br />
more graphic, more raw. During festivals, people dropped their<br />
veils and stopped performing, ignored authority and let rip. They<br />
broke out of everyday life by affirming what was already dormant<br />
in everyday life—and dormant in themselves. Festivals “differed<br />
from everyday life,” sometimes “contrasted violently with<br />
14