02.07.2013 Views

Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

U r b a n r e v o L U t i o n<br />

global canvas as they colonize the lived. And they unite around a<br />

common urban praxis: “the generalized terrorism of the quantifiable”<br />

(p. 244; p. 185).<br />

This motley band he pejoratively dubs “the urbanists,” who<br />

“cut into grids and squares.” “Technocrats,” <strong>Lefebvre</strong> notes,<br />

“unaware of what’s going on in their own mind and in their working<br />

concepts, profoundly misjudging in their blind field what’s<br />

going on (and what isn’t), end up meticulously organizing a repressive<br />

space” (p. 208; p. 157). Urbanism thus finds itself caught<br />

between the rock and the hard place, “between those who decide<br />

on behalf of ‘private’ interests and those who decide on behalf<br />

of higher institutions and power.” The urban wilts under a historic<br />

compromise between neoliberalism and neomanagerialism,<br />

“which opens the playing field for the activity of ‘free enterprise.’<br />

” The urbanist duly slips into the cracks, making a career<br />

in the shady recesses between “developers and power structures,”<br />

a monkey to each organ grinder. A true left critique, accordingly,<br />

must attack the promoters of the urban “as object,” as an entity<br />

of economic expansion in which investment and growth are ends<br />

in themselves. The agents of this mind-set, meanwhile, the topdown,<br />

self-perpetuating cybernanthropes, must everywhere and<br />

always be refuted.<br />

For <strong>Lefebvre</strong>, the cybernanthrope was the antihumanist incarnate,<br />

a reviled man cum machine, the air-conditioned official<br />

obsessed with information systems, with scientific rationality,<br />

with classification and control. In a profoundly witty and scathing<br />

text, Vers le cybernanthrope [Towards the cybernanthrope] (1971),<br />

<strong>Lefebvre</strong> claims cybernetic culture has cut—not unlike Robert<br />

Moses slicing into New York—a swath for the urban revolution<br />

and proliferated through urbanism as ideology. Voici everything<br />

<strong>Lefebvre</strong> hates. Their type, their policies, their urban programs,<br />

the very presence of technocrats on planet earth offended him; they<br />

were antithetical to all he stood for, all he desired. Their type plots<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!