Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
U r b a n r e v o L U t i o n<br />
global canvas as they colonize the lived. And they unite around a<br />
common urban praxis: “the generalized terrorism of the quantifiable”<br />
(p. 244; p. 185).<br />
This motley band he pejoratively dubs “the urbanists,” who<br />
“cut into grids and squares.” “Technocrats,” <strong>Lefebvre</strong> notes,<br />
“unaware of what’s going on in their own mind and in their working<br />
concepts, profoundly misjudging in their blind field what’s<br />
going on (and what isn’t), end up meticulously organizing a repressive<br />
space” (p. 208; p. 157). Urbanism thus finds itself caught<br />
between the rock and the hard place, “between those who decide<br />
on behalf of ‘private’ interests and those who decide on behalf<br />
of higher institutions and power.” The urban wilts under a historic<br />
compromise between neoliberalism and neomanagerialism,<br />
“which opens the playing field for the activity of ‘free enterprise.’<br />
” The urbanist duly slips into the cracks, making a career<br />
in the shady recesses between “developers and power structures,”<br />
a monkey to each organ grinder. A true left critique, accordingly,<br />
must attack the promoters of the urban “as object,” as an entity<br />
of economic expansion in which investment and growth are ends<br />
in themselves. The agents of this mind-set, meanwhile, the topdown,<br />
self-perpetuating cybernanthropes, must everywhere and<br />
always be refuted.<br />
For <strong>Lefebvre</strong>, the cybernanthrope was the antihumanist incarnate,<br />
a reviled man cum machine, the air-conditioned official<br />
obsessed with information systems, with scientific rationality,<br />
with classification and control. In a profoundly witty and scathing<br />
text, Vers le cybernanthrope [Towards the cybernanthrope] (1971),<br />
<strong>Lefebvre</strong> claims cybernetic culture has cut—not unlike Robert<br />
Moses slicing into New York—a swath for the urban revolution<br />
and proliferated through urbanism as ideology. Voici everything<br />
<strong>Lefebvre</strong> hates. Their type, their policies, their urban programs,<br />
the very presence of technocrats on planet earth offended him; they<br />
were antithetical to all he stood for, all he desired. Their type plots<br />
9