02.07.2013 Views

Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

U r b a n i t y<br />

Still, every time he sees these Le Corbusian “machines for living<br />

in,” he’s terrified, adamant that such a new mode of life is<br />

Cartesian through and through, compartmentalizing different<br />

facets of human activity, zoning things here and there, creating<br />

functional spaces and atomized people who are turned inward,<br />

away from one another, even though they’re often piled on top of<br />

one another.<br />

It is in Mourenx, <strong>Lefebvre</strong> says (p. 119), where “modernity<br />

opens its pages to me.” There, rational knowledge, technological<br />

ingenuity, and a Logos big-brain fix to pressing human needs<br />

equates to separation—of people and activity—all done in the<br />

name of efficiency and profitability. <strong>Lefebvre</strong>, as ever, is less<br />

interested in economic machinations than with metaphysical misgivings.<br />

He invokes the young Marx and a left-wing Hegel, both<br />

of whom strove to reconcile the Cartesian partitioning of mind<br />

and matter, of subject and object, rather than reify it in physical<br />

space. For <strong>Lefebvre</strong>, every New Town, every new suburb—every<br />

Levittown, Middletown, or Our Town emerging out of the rubble—has<br />

hacked up space and simplified life, decanted people,<br />

and flattened experience. At the same time, separation means separation<br />

within the self, a partitioning of consciousness, an inability<br />

to connect organically with what’s around you, to think the whole,<br />

to understand the totality of your life—or to not want to understand<br />

it anymore. As <strong>Lefebvre</strong> sees it, planners and technocrats,<br />

in cahoots with bankers, constructors, and realtors, have somehow<br />

become new “Grand Inquisitors,” profiting financially and politically<br />

from modernization, promising people bread and security as<br />

long as they can stealthily control their freedom.<br />

The accusation redoubles <strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s commitment to Marxist<br />

humanism, only now this commitment has a territorial embodiment,<br />

is conceived as a spatialized Marxist humanism. Now, a<br />

more wholesome personhood is predicated on a more wholesome<br />

organization of urban and rural space. In the course of its long<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!