Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction - autonomous learning
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
U r b a n i t y<br />
Still, every time he sees these Le Corbusian “machines for living<br />
in,” he’s terrified, adamant that such a new mode of life is<br />
Cartesian through and through, compartmentalizing different<br />
facets of human activity, zoning things here and there, creating<br />
functional spaces and atomized people who are turned inward,<br />
away from one another, even though they’re often piled on top of<br />
one another.<br />
It is in Mourenx, <strong>Lefebvre</strong> says (p. 119), where “modernity<br />
opens its pages to me.” There, rational knowledge, technological<br />
ingenuity, and a Logos big-brain fix to pressing human needs<br />
equates to separation—of people and activity—all done in the<br />
name of efficiency and profitability. <strong>Lefebvre</strong>, as ever, is less<br />
interested in economic machinations than with metaphysical misgivings.<br />
He invokes the young Marx and a left-wing Hegel, both<br />
of whom strove to reconcile the Cartesian partitioning of mind<br />
and matter, of subject and object, rather than reify it in physical<br />
space. For <strong>Lefebvre</strong>, every New Town, every new suburb—every<br />
Levittown, Middletown, or Our Town emerging out of the rubble—has<br />
hacked up space and simplified life, decanted people,<br />
and flattened experience. At the same time, separation means separation<br />
within the self, a partitioning of consciousness, an inability<br />
to connect organically with what’s around you, to think the whole,<br />
to understand the totality of your life—or to not want to understand<br />
it anymore. As <strong>Lefebvre</strong> sees it, planners and technocrats,<br />
in cahoots with bankers, constructors, and realtors, have somehow<br />
become new “Grand Inquisitors,” profiting financially and politically<br />
from modernization, promising people bread and security as<br />
long as they can stealthily control their freedom.<br />
The accusation redoubles <strong>Lefebvre</strong>’s commitment to Marxist<br />
humanism, only now this commitment has a territorial embodiment,<br />
is conceived as a spatialized Marxist humanism. Now, a<br />
more wholesome personhood is predicated on a more wholesome<br />
organization of urban and rural space. In the course of its long<br />
61