02.07.2013 Views

Technology and Terminology of Knapped Stone - IRIT

Technology and Terminology of Knapped Stone - IRIT

Technology and Terminology of Knapped Stone - IRIT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Clean breaks are indicated by two short parallel dashes on either side <strong>of</strong> the broken zone.<br />

Barring exceptions, breaks do not require being represented on any particular view. However,<br />

when the break can be observed on the upper or lower face view it is shaded <strong>and</strong> hatched with<br />

direction lines like the rest <strong>of</strong> the drawing.<br />

Some objects display modern breaks or retouches, which should be left blank. Any blank<br />

area is considered to be <strong>of</strong> modern origin; it is therefore very important that the entire surface <strong>of</strong><br />

the drawing should be inked (using dots, dashes, direction lines).<br />

• Knapping accidents<br />

Flakes that display a "Siret" accidental break are oriented like any other flake, with a<br />

symbol accompanying the proximal part: a double crossed arrow pulled out <strong>of</strong> line. A dot<br />

denotes the presence <strong>of</strong> a half-butt (fig. 34 : 7).<br />

Languette breaks are indicated by two short, wide dashes on either side <strong>of</strong> the fracture,<br />

<strong>and</strong> by the side view <strong>of</strong> its missing complement.<br />

The same conventions apply to nacelle breaks (figs. 7 : 3, 4, 5).<br />

• Special techniques<br />

Microburin blow technique (fig. 33)<br />

The "piquant-triedre" is shown on the upper face view <strong>and</strong> is supplemented by the<br />

outline drawing <strong>of</strong> the missing part, i.e. the microburin. This device allows an unambiguous<br />

rendering <strong>of</strong> the technique itself, which is otherwise difficult to portray.<br />

Burin blow technique (figs. 57, 58, 59, 79)<br />

The removal negatives associated with this technique are emphasized by arrows. These<br />

are oriented <strong>and</strong> directed according to the burin blow negatives they indicate. Numbers specify<br />

the order <strong>of</strong> removal, when the latter can be determined.<br />

The last burin blow is symbolized by a solid arrow. When the negative bulb is present a<br />

dot is added to the arrow.<br />

The negatives <strong>of</strong> previous burin blows are symbolized by broken arrows (short dashes).<br />

• Macroscopic wear traces (figs. 51 <strong>and</strong> 53)<br />

Blunting is the outcome <strong>of</strong> any action that has altered a cutting edge by making it less<br />

sharp. Abrasion refers to the wear <strong>of</strong> an edge through friction.<br />

These two types <strong>of</strong> wear are symbolized by a dotted line outside the drawing. The length<br />

<strong>and</strong> position <strong>of</strong> the dotted line indicates the altered zones. The intensity <strong>of</strong> wear is empirically<br />

shown by varying the size <strong>of</strong> the dots.<br />

• Gloss (fig. 51)<br />

This refers to the shiny aspect <strong>of</strong> a surface brought about by friction. Gloss is symbolized<br />

by applying a fine grade stippled shading film to all the surfaces where it can be observed, both<br />

on the upper <strong>and</strong> lower faces. Sometimes, a line <strong>of</strong> small regular circles or dots accompanies the<br />

shading film symbol. It is positioned outside the drawing, along the gloss-bearing zone on the<br />

upper or lower face.<br />

Assessing<br />

The quality <strong>of</strong> a published illustration should be assessed to ensure that it can be correctly<br />

interpreted. Indeed, an aesthetically pleasing drawing is not necessarily an informative one. There<br />

are six indispensable criteria to be considered for the adequate assessment <strong>of</strong> a graphical<br />

representation.<br />

1. Scal e<br />

Illustrations must always include a bar scale specifying the st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>of</strong> measurement. For<br />

the sake <strong>of</strong> consistency <strong>and</strong> legibility, all the drawings for one article should have the same scale.<br />

If drawings displayed on the same plate do not have the same reduction factor because <strong>of</strong> layout<br />

constraints, a bar scale must be related to each <strong>of</strong> them.<br />

Bar scales are <strong>of</strong>ten subsituted for by verbal scales (e.g. FS for Full Scale) or by<br />

representative fractions in the caption. This is strongly advised against because the true<br />

proportions will not be retained when the drawing is reduced. Some illustrations have been<br />

123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!