Technology and Terminology of Knapped Stone - IRIT
Technology and Terminology of Knapped Stone - IRIT
Technology and Terminology of Knapped Stone - IRIT
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Clean breaks are indicated by two short parallel dashes on either side <strong>of</strong> the broken zone.<br />
Barring exceptions, breaks do not require being represented on any particular view. However,<br />
when the break can be observed on the upper or lower face view it is shaded <strong>and</strong> hatched with<br />
direction lines like the rest <strong>of</strong> the drawing.<br />
Some objects display modern breaks or retouches, which should be left blank. Any blank<br />
area is considered to be <strong>of</strong> modern origin; it is therefore very important that the entire surface <strong>of</strong><br />
the drawing should be inked (using dots, dashes, direction lines).<br />
• Knapping accidents<br />
Flakes that display a "Siret" accidental break are oriented like any other flake, with a<br />
symbol accompanying the proximal part: a double crossed arrow pulled out <strong>of</strong> line. A dot<br />
denotes the presence <strong>of</strong> a half-butt (fig. 34 : 7).<br />
Languette breaks are indicated by two short, wide dashes on either side <strong>of</strong> the fracture,<br />
<strong>and</strong> by the side view <strong>of</strong> its missing complement.<br />
The same conventions apply to nacelle breaks (figs. 7 : 3, 4, 5).<br />
• Special techniques<br />
Microburin blow technique (fig. 33)<br />
The "piquant-triedre" is shown on the upper face view <strong>and</strong> is supplemented by the<br />
outline drawing <strong>of</strong> the missing part, i.e. the microburin. This device allows an unambiguous<br />
rendering <strong>of</strong> the technique itself, which is otherwise difficult to portray.<br />
Burin blow technique (figs. 57, 58, 59, 79)<br />
The removal negatives associated with this technique are emphasized by arrows. These<br />
are oriented <strong>and</strong> directed according to the burin blow negatives they indicate. Numbers specify<br />
the order <strong>of</strong> removal, when the latter can be determined.<br />
The last burin blow is symbolized by a solid arrow. When the negative bulb is present a<br />
dot is added to the arrow.<br />
The negatives <strong>of</strong> previous burin blows are symbolized by broken arrows (short dashes).<br />
• Macroscopic wear traces (figs. 51 <strong>and</strong> 53)<br />
Blunting is the outcome <strong>of</strong> any action that has altered a cutting edge by making it less<br />
sharp. Abrasion refers to the wear <strong>of</strong> an edge through friction.<br />
These two types <strong>of</strong> wear are symbolized by a dotted line outside the drawing. The length<br />
<strong>and</strong> position <strong>of</strong> the dotted line indicates the altered zones. The intensity <strong>of</strong> wear is empirically<br />
shown by varying the size <strong>of</strong> the dots.<br />
• Gloss (fig. 51)<br />
This refers to the shiny aspect <strong>of</strong> a surface brought about by friction. Gloss is symbolized<br />
by applying a fine grade stippled shading film to all the surfaces where it can be observed, both<br />
on the upper <strong>and</strong> lower faces. Sometimes, a line <strong>of</strong> small regular circles or dots accompanies the<br />
shading film symbol. It is positioned outside the drawing, along the gloss-bearing zone on the<br />
upper or lower face.<br />
Assessing<br />
The quality <strong>of</strong> a published illustration should be assessed to ensure that it can be correctly<br />
interpreted. Indeed, an aesthetically pleasing drawing is not necessarily an informative one. There<br />
are six indispensable criteria to be considered for the adequate assessment <strong>of</strong> a graphical<br />
representation.<br />
1. Scal e<br />
Illustrations must always include a bar scale specifying the st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>of</strong> measurement. For<br />
the sake <strong>of</strong> consistency <strong>and</strong> legibility, all the drawings for one article should have the same scale.<br />
If drawings displayed on the same plate do not have the same reduction factor because <strong>of</strong> layout<br />
constraints, a bar scale must be related to each <strong>of</strong> them.<br />
Bar scales are <strong>of</strong>ten subsituted for by verbal scales (e.g. FS for Full Scale) or by<br />
representative fractions in the caption. This is strongly advised against because the true<br />
proportions will not be retained when the drawing is reduced. Some illustrations have been<br />
123