07.07.2013 Views

A guide for planners and managers - IUCN

A guide for planners and managers - IUCN

A guide for planners and managers - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.5 Social Criteria<br />

Social <strong>and</strong> cultural benefits can be assessed in the following terms:<br />

PART I<br />

Selection of Marine Protected Areas<br />

1. Social acceptance: the degree to which the support of local people is assured.<br />

Every ef<strong>for</strong>t should be made to nurture local support. An area that is already<br />

protected by local tradition or practice should be rein<strong>for</strong>ced, <strong>and</strong> the area should<br />

receive a higher rating. An “official” protected area designation may still be<br />

necessary, even if local support is high, to ensure government recognition of the<br />

area. For example, central government <strong>planners</strong> gave out part of a sacred <strong>for</strong>est<br />

on Chale Isl<strong>and</strong> in Kenya to a hotel developer, despite its protection at the local<br />

level <strong>for</strong> possibly hundreds of years.<br />

2. Public health: the degree to which the creation of a marine protected area may<br />

serve to diminish pollution or other disease agents that contribute to public<br />

health problems. Granting protected status to contaminated areas, such as shellfish<br />

beds or bathing beaches, may result in reduced pollution as the polluting source<br />

is identified <strong>and</strong> controlled as part of the plan <strong>for</strong> site management.<br />

3. Recreation: the degree to which the area is, or could be, used <strong>for</strong> recreation by<br />

country residents. Sites that provide the local community the opportunity to use,<br />

enjoy, <strong>and</strong> learn about their local natural environment should rate highly <strong>for</strong> this<br />

criterion.<br />

4. Culture: the religious, historic, artistic, or other cultural value of the site. Natural<br />

areas that also contain important cultural features should be given high ratings<br />

as they will benefit from a high level of local support, <strong>and</strong> their protection may<br />

help to maintain the integrity of the adjacent ecosystems.<br />

5. Aesthetics: a seascape, l<strong>and</strong>scape, or other area of exceptional scenic beauty (Figure<br />

I-43). Natural areas that also contain features of natural beauty should be given<br />

higher ratings since the safe-<br />

FIGURE I-43.<br />

guarding of such features often<br />

requires that the integrity be maintained<br />

of adjacent coastal <strong>and</strong><br />

marine systems. However, where<br />

species diversity <strong>and</strong> the biological<br />

conservation values are low, such<br />

areas retain a high value <strong>for</strong> recreation<br />

<strong>and</strong> tourism<br />

6. Conflicts of interest: the degree<br />

to which area protection would<br />

affect the activities of local residents.<br />

If the area is to be used <strong>for</strong><br />

recreation purposes, <strong>for</strong> example,<br />

The Seventy Rock Isl<strong>and</strong>s MPA of Palau is a place of<br />

exceptional beauty.<br />

89<br />

Photo by John Clark.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!