07.07.2013 Views

A guide for planners and managers - IUCN

A guide for planners and managers - IUCN

A guide for planners and managers - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PART II<br />

Protected Areas <strong>for</strong> Small Isl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

defined areas. It may be possible to accomplish this through a multiple use approach<br />

whereby areas are zoned <strong>for</strong> different uses <strong>and</strong> such uses are controlled by season<br />

to regulate the capture of breeding organisms, <strong>and</strong> the use <strong>and</strong> management of<br />

resources is divided among villages toward their self-interest in the sustainability of<br />

harvest.<br />

3.5 Design Guidelines <strong>and</strong> Considerations<br />

The entire isl<strong>and</strong> should be protected if all of its area is important <strong>for</strong> conservation<br />

(e.g., a small isl<strong>and</strong> totally covered by nesting seabirds). If not, limited access <strong>and</strong><br />

facilities may be appropriate in areas well separated <strong>and</strong> naturally screened from the<br />

conservation sites.<br />

Managing visitor use <strong>and</strong> access require greater emphasis than details of design<br />

on protected isl<strong>and</strong>s. Nonetheless, it is important to buffer isl<strong>and</strong>s from upcurrent<br />

sources of pollution, particularly oil production <strong>and</strong> loading sites. Oil can be disastrous<br />

to species inhabiting the ocean-atmosphere <strong>and</strong> ocean-l<strong>and</strong> interfaces.<br />

One large isl<strong>and</strong> is generally a better choice than several smaller ones of the<br />

same total area, because the straits separating an isl<strong>and</strong> cluster may prove impassable<br />

barriers to many species.<br />

If circumstances dem<strong>and</strong> that one select a cluster of smaller isl<strong>and</strong>s rather than<br />

a large one, it is important that these should be as close together as possible to<br />

increase the chances of immigration.<br />

A protected area on an isl<strong>and</strong> should be as circular as possible. This maximizes<br />

the area-to- perimeter ratio, which minimizes the dispersal distances within a reserve.<br />

Elongate protected areas <strong>and</strong> isl<strong>and</strong>s are likely to suffer “peninsula effects,” <strong>for</strong><br />

example, dispersal rates to outlying parts from central areas may be too slow to avoid<br />

local extinction.<br />

Theoretically speaking, an isl<strong>and</strong> protected area should be as close to a source<br />

of colonizing species as possible (a mainl<strong>and</strong> or large isl<strong>and</strong>) to maximize the<br />

immigration rate <strong>and</strong> the survival of a greater diversity of organisms. In practice,<br />

however, isl<strong>and</strong>s closer to human habitation are less likely to retain their pristine<br />

condition, <strong>and</strong> have greater poaching problems. The choice between a nearby isl<strong>and</strong><br />

with a higher immigration rate of both organisms <strong>and</strong> people <strong>and</strong> a remote, more<br />

pristine isl<strong>and</strong> must be determined by the proximity of human habitation <strong>and</strong> the degree<br />

of threat posed by people.<br />

Distribution of endemic species among protected areas on several different isl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

increases their survival prospects in the face of disease or accidental introduction of<br />

predators (rats, cats).<br />

There are a few proponents of designing a protected area around a number of<br />

small isl<strong>and</strong>s rather than on one large isl<strong>and</strong>, citing several advantages:<br />

219

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!