07.07.2013 Views

A guide for planners and managers - IUCN

A guide for planners and managers - IUCN

A guide for planners and managers - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PART III<br />

Case Histories of Marine Protected Areas<br />

In June 1987, Government moved to provide more effective protection by<br />

declaring a major part of Caroni Swamp a Protected Area <strong>and</strong> to seek restricted access<br />

<strong>and</strong> resource exploitation activity within the whole area. The number of Scarlet Ibis<br />

remained fairly constant, but nesting activity had rapidly declined <strong>and</strong> virtually<br />

ceased by the late 1980’s. It appeared that the management system designed <strong>for</strong> this<br />

coastal MPAwas proving ineffective.<br />

This study examines some of the factors that may have contributed to the<br />

decline in ibis nesting <strong>and</strong> the ecological status of its mangrove habitat, in relation<br />

to the management strategy used. The lessons learned have general application to other<br />

tropical coastal protected areas.<br />

Problems in Protected Area Management<br />

The management system introduced in Caroni was a traditional ‘top-down’ approach,<br />

using a government agency to en<strong>for</strong>ce protective legislation. However, the low level<br />

of national commitment to habitat <strong>and</strong> wildlife conservation during the 1980’s <strong>and</strong><br />

early 1990’s resulted in inadequate provision <strong>for</strong> manpower <strong>and</strong> equipment <strong>for</strong><br />

effective policing. Shortages of wardens, vehicles, boats <strong>and</strong> finance at the Wildlife<br />

Section led to poor en<strong>for</strong>cement, despite a high level of commitment by the staff. Further<br />

to this, the regulatory agency experienced a lack of cooperation from resource users<br />

on two fronts. Firstly, establishment of the sanctuary <strong>and</strong> the later expansion of the<br />

protected area alienated fishermen, oyster collectors <strong>and</strong> hunters; many of whom had<br />

a long history of access <strong>and</strong> resource use in the Caroni Swamp. Secondly, there was<br />

a regrettable failure to involve the tour boat operators in conservation decisionmaking.<br />

This resulted in an inequitable situation in which large sums of money were<br />

being made by some tour operators, while Government had to foot the bill <strong>for</strong><br />

management of the swamp resources on which their livelihood depended.<br />

Secondly, when a period of further research was initiated by the University of<br />

the West Indies in 1993, it became apparent that a number of ecological changes had<br />

occurred in Caroni Swamp. These included a marked increase in ambient salinity,<br />

considerable spread of mangrove vegetation resulting in occlusion of several of the<br />

swamp channels <strong>and</strong> areas of open lagoon, <strong>and</strong> a general decline in plant <strong>and</strong> animal<br />

diversity. The <strong>managers</strong> appeared to be unaware of these changes, <strong>and</strong> made no<br />

adjustment to customary management practices (although a number of regular<br />

visitors commented on the deterioration in the tourism experience).<br />

Lessons Learned<br />

An initial mistake appears to have been providing protection only to one component<br />

of the ibis habitat range. Mangrove <strong>for</strong>est <strong>and</strong> tidal mudflats were effectively protected,<br />

but the associated freshwater habitat was not—meanwhile this was being reclaimed<br />

<strong>and</strong> depleted. The sizeable area of mangrove swamp which was protected provided<br />

335

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!