07.07.2013 Views

A guide for planners and managers - IUCN

A guide for planners and managers - IUCN

A guide for planners and managers - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

110 MARINE AND COASTAL<br />

PROTECTED AREAS<br />

Box I-8. Special Habitats<br />

CZM should recognize three types of particularly valuable habitats by identifying<br />

the following three categories:<br />

1. Generic types of habitats: Those that are widely recognized as highly valuable <strong>and</strong><br />

that should be given a high degree of protection through regulatory mechanisms—<br />

wetl<strong>and</strong>s, seagrass meadows, coral reefs, species nesting sites. All should be mapped<br />

<strong>and</strong> publicized. In the CZM process of project review, developers would be required<br />

to avoid these types of habitats; there<strong>for</strong>e, developers must be in<strong>for</strong>med ahead of<br />

time (be<strong>for</strong>e they design projects) that restrictions exist. In addition to ecologically<br />

valuable areas, other types of areas should be identified, such as s<strong>and</strong> dunes (which<br />

stabilize beaches) <strong>and</strong> flood-prone lowl<strong>and</strong>s (those that are regularly flooded) both<br />

of which would be included in a “natural hazards prevention” category.<br />

2. Specific sites: Those that are identified as Special Habitats <strong>and</strong> should be identified<br />

<strong>for</strong> special regulatory protection. These would include certain specific (named)<br />

lagoons, estuaries, isl<strong>and</strong>s, mangrove <strong>for</strong>ests, river deltas, coral reefs, <strong>and</strong> so <strong>for</strong>th.<br />

Each would be described, mapped <strong>and</strong> announced <strong>for</strong> the knowledge of all interested<br />

parties. The CZM authority would strongly constrain development in these site-specific<br />

habitats by regulation. As “red flag” areas, they would get special analysis in the<br />

development review process.<br />

3. Resource Reserves <strong>and</strong> Other MPAs: This category includes critical marine <strong>and</strong><br />

coastal resource areas that need the additional safeguard of the type of custodial<br />

protection that is awarded to terrestrial parks <strong>and</strong> reserves. Such MPAs would be<br />

assigned to the country’s existing conservation agency <strong>for</strong> management. Proprietorship<br />

(whether through ownership or custodianship) generally confers a higher level of<br />

autonomy than does CZM regulation through the “police power” (as in (2) above).<br />

Source: modified from Clark, 1998.<br />

1. Generic habitat types: all mangrove <strong>for</strong>ests are included in a “special planning areas”<br />

category.<br />

2. Specific sites (critical areas): numerous bays, lagoons <strong>and</strong> other coastal features<br />

are included in a list of site-specific special planning areas.<br />

3. Protected Areas: numerous coastal areas of exceptional natural value are identified<br />

as potential Natural Reserves.<br />

CZM uses the current concepts of sustainable use, multiple use, rights to the<br />

commons, biodiversity, zoning, protection of special habitats, public participation,<br />

capacity building, institutional strengthening, co-management, situation management,<br />

<strong>and</strong> integrated management. The key is unitary management of the zone, which<br />

treats the shorel<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> coastal waters as a single interacting unit <strong>and</strong> coordinates<br />

the interest of all stakeholders (Clark, 1998). Full participation of stakeholders is a<br />

necessity (Box I-9).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!