07.07.2013 Views

A guide for planners and managers - IUCN

A guide for planners and managers - IUCN

A guide for planners and managers - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

180 MARINE AND COASTAL<br />

PROTECTED AREAS<br />

Photo by R. Salm.<br />

as tropical storms, from which reefs recover naturally with time. Human activities<br />

increase the burden of stress <strong>and</strong> may prevent normal recovery by increasing the<br />

extinction rate or decreasing the immigration rate.<br />

To maintain the balance between immigration <strong>and</strong> extinction rates we need to<br />

ensure a steady source of propagules (eggs, larvae, <strong>and</strong> juveniles) to replenish stressed<br />

areas. Large reefs may be self-replenishing. They manage to achieve this because their<br />

large size allows portions of reef damaged by slumping (collapse of the reef slope),<br />

storm surges, prolonged exposure to air, heat, or freshwater, bleaching, crown-of-thorns<br />

starfish, or other stresses to be recolonized by propagules from undamaged parts of<br />

the same reef. Such large reefs are mosaics of patches in different stages of community<br />

development <strong>and</strong> redevelopment (Connell, 1978).<br />

We have previously stated that, on balance, fewer large protected areas are to<br />

be favored over a greater number of smaller ones. This principle applies in selecting<br />

<strong>and</strong> delineating coral reef protected areas.<br />

The optimal size of a protected reef area is designed around a strictly controlled<br />

sanctuary zone or core, which encompasses sufficient reef to be self-replenishing <strong>for</strong><br />

all species. This is particularly important if preserving biological diversity is the<br />

principal management objective. This design is less important <strong>for</strong> other objectives—<br />

<strong>for</strong> example, maintaining the area’s value <strong>for</strong> recreation, tourism, research, <strong>and</strong><br />

education—or safeguarding specific breeding populations of particular species, like<br />

giant clams (Tridacna gigas), that have smaller area requirements (Figure II-13).<br />

The critical minimum core size <strong>for</strong> protected coral reefs is that smallest reef<br />

size in which all species in the general vicinity are virtually certain to be found. For<br />

example, core areas encompass at least 300 ha <strong>for</strong> each reef type in the Chagos<br />

Archipelago (Salm, 1980b, 1984).<br />

FIGURE II-13.<br />

The remainder of the reserve<br />

(including reef flats, l<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong><br />

intervening <strong>and</strong> surrounding<br />

waters) functions as a buffer <strong>and</strong><br />

is zoned <strong>for</strong> different uses. In<br />

addition to the core area, there<br />

may be research zones, education<br />

zones, visitor zones (perhaps used<br />

on a rotational basis), <strong>and</strong> fisheries<br />

zones. All may be planned<br />

within a single reserve.<br />

Tridacna derasa is an endangered giant clam species, an animal<br />

whose survival depends on the protection of suitable reef habitats<br />

(identified protected area, Taka Bone, Rate, Flores Sea, Indonesia).<br />

One possible way to determine<br />

the critical minimum core<br />

size of coral reef protected areas<br />

is outlined below. However, if<br />

urgency or lack of funds <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!