24.07.2013 Views

February 15-18, 2009 Washington State Convention Center Seattle ...

February 15-18, 2009 Washington State Convention Center Seattle ...

February 15-18, 2009 Washington State Convention Center Seattle ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

110<br />

AN IMPLANTED MINITATURE ACOUSTIC TAG EVALUATION ON SUB-YEARLING FALL<br />

CHINOOK SALMON Oncorhynchus tshawytscha<br />

Deborah Frost*, R. Lynn McComas and B. Sandford<br />

NOAA Fisheries<br />

Northwest Fisheries Science <strong>Center</strong><br />

Manchester Research Station<br />

7305 Beach Drive E.<br />

Port Orchard, <strong>Washington</strong> 98366 USA<br />

Debbie.Frost@noaa.gov<br />

Implantable acoustic tags are often used to assess salmonid smolt behavior, survival, habitat use and predation risk. However,<br />

the relatively large size of some acoustic tags limits their use in juvenile fish. A miniature implantable acoustic tag prototype<br />

(21 mm by 7 mm by 6 mm and 0.9 g in air) was evaluated in three separate groups of Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha<br />

smolts for impacts on 1) growth and survival, 2) predation risk and 3) behavioral differences. Growth rate over a 30-day<br />

period was significantly affected by the tag (P = 0.003 for length and 0.000 for weight, Table 1). Tag to body weight ratio<br />

ranged from 2.6 to 5.9% at tagging. Survival was not affected, however, partial to complete tag expulsion was noted in 37% of<br />

the tagged fish in the growth evaluation group. Implantation of an active miniature prototype acoustic tag did not significantly<br />

affect predation risk (P = 0.255). Non-significant differences in behavior involving activity level (P = 0.467) and position in<br />

the water column (P = 0.298) (Figure 1) were also seen, however the small sample sizes in both the predation and behavior<br />

evaluations suggested trends toward an affect by either the tag or the surgical procedure. These evaluations showed a tendency<br />

for growth and tag retention to affect the overall successful use of this size of tag in this size of fish by impeding growth and<br />

potentially contributing to false mortality with expulsed tags. The study emphasizes the need for careful evaluation for longterm<br />

effects prior to field use.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!