24.07.2013 Views

February 15-18, 2009 Washington State Convention Center Seattle ...

February 15-18, 2009 Washington State Convention Center Seattle ...

February 15-18, 2009 Washington State Convention Center Seattle ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

210<br />

REPLACEMENT OF FISHMEAL WITH POULTRY BYPRODUCT MEAL IN DIETS FOR<br />

JUVENILE BLUEGILL Lepomis macrochirus<br />

Karthik Masagounder*, Robert S. Hayward and Jeffre D. Firman<br />

Department of Fisheries & Wildlife Sciences<br />

University of Missouri<br />

Columbia, MO 65211 USA<br />

kmb6b@mizzou.edu<br />

A 60-d trial was conducted to determine the percentage of fish meal that could be replaced by poultry byproduct meal (PBM)<br />

in the diet of juvenile bluegills Lepomis macrochirus (~<strong>18</strong> g initial weight) without affecting their growth performance. A<br />

control diet contained 54.6% of fish meal (Table 1). Fish meal from the control diet was progressively replaced with PBM at<br />

20% increments from 0% to 100%, resulting in six diets containing PBM at 0% (PBM0), 10.9% (PBM20), 21.8% (PBM40),<br />

32.7% (PBM60), 43.6% (PBM80), and 54.6% (PBM100) levels. Gross energy levels in the six diets ranged from <strong>18</strong>.3 MJ Kg -1<br />

(PBM0) to 19.5 MJ Kg -1 (PBM100). Total amino acid content of the diets ranged from 41 % (PBM0) to 43 % (PBM100). Under<br />

a randomized complete block design, bluegills (n=16/group) were housed individually in plastic test chambers and fed twice<br />

daily at 4% (days 0-30) or 3% (days 30-60) of body weight. Pellets from diet 3 (PBM40) with 40% replacement of fish meal<br />

exhibited low water stability due to an error that occurred in the extrusion program. Consequently, fish that were fed this diet<br />

were excluded from statistical analyses. Data analyses on weight gain (g), Wr (%), hepatosomatic index (HSI), viscerosomatic<br />

index (VSI), visceral fat (%) showed no differences (P>0.05, ANOVA) among dietary groups for any of the metrics (Table 2).<br />

Study results indicate that fish meal can be completely replaced by PBM without affecting growth performance or well-being<br />

of juvenile bluegill reared for 60 d.<br />

Bluegills are aggressive fish and are known to form strong dominance hierarchies when held in groups. This often results in a<br />

few individuals acquiring a high percentage of the feed provided, and the remaining fish receiving much less. Consequences<br />

of dominance hierarchy formation include reduced mean growth and feed efficiency, as well as increased size variation among<br />

bluegills in a tank/chamber. Therefore, the current experiment concerning effects of PBM replacement was conducted with<br />

bluegills that were housed individually. However, we observed that some individually housed bluegills were reluctant to feed<br />

initially, and this factor produced poor overall feed efficiency (~0.5). A similar PBM experiment with group-housed bluegills is<br />

underway to determine whether results based on individually-held bluegills will lead to different conclusions than when groupheld<br />

bluegills are evaluated.<br />

Table 1. Formulations of control diet. Table 2. Final weight (g), weight gain (g), viscerosomatic index (VSI), hepatosomatic<br />

Ingredients g Kg -1<br />

Fish meal 545.5<br />

PBM 0.0<br />

Wheat 246.4<br />

SBM 120.0<br />

Fish oil 74.7<br />

Lecithin 3.0<br />

Vitamin premix 2.5<br />

Dicalcium<br />

2.0<br />

phosphate<br />

Choline-Cl 1.4<br />

Mineral premix 1.0<br />

Vitamin C-PP 0.7<br />

Binder 2.8<br />

Variable<br />

index (HSI), final relative condition factor (Kn), and visceral fat content (%) of juvenile<br />

bluegill fed the the five experimental diets for 60 days. Values are presented<br />

PBM0<br />

(n = <strong>15</strong>)<br />

as means±SE.<br />

* n =3 for visceral fat analysis<br />

PBM20<br />

(n = 16)<br />

PBM60<br />

(n = <strong>15</strong>)<br />

PBM80<br />

(n = 16)<br />

P-value<br />

PBM100<br />

(ANOVA,<br />

(n = 14)<br />

proc glm)<br />

Final weight (g) 48.8±3.2 44.2±2.0 41.0±1.9 42.7±2.2 43.6±2.2 0.36<br />

Weight gain (g) 30.4±2.9 25.9±1.6 24.8±1.8 26.1±2.2 25.4±2.1 0.49<br />

VSI (%) 12.3±1.1 14.9±1.0 14.0±1.1 14.3±1.5 <strong>15</strong>.0±1.6 0.33<br />

HSI (%) 0.9±0.1 0.4±0.1 1.1±0.1 0.5±0.1 1.0±0.1 0.33<br />

Wr (%) 109.9±2.5 106.9±2.8 107.8±2.5 108.1±3.3 106±2.0 0.90<br />

Visceral fat (%)* 46.7±2.2 39.5±3.1 44.5±2.8 47.3±1.5 42.4±0.9 0.17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!