24.07.2013 Views

February 15-18, 2009 Washington State Convention Center Seattle ...

February 15-18, 2009 Washington State Convention Center Seattle ...

February 15-18, 2009 Washington State Convention Center Seattle ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1 0<br />

EVALUATION OF SUBSTRATES IN BIOLOGICAL FILTERS FOR REARING PACIFIC<br />

WHITE SHRIMP Litopenaeus vannamei IN CLOSED SYSTEMS<br />

Mario Hernández-Acosta, Abundio González-González, Gilberto Gutiérrez-Salazar, Francisco M Guzmán-Saenz,<br />

Jorge Loredo-Osti, Pablo González-Alanis and Kevin Fitzsimmons<br />

Environmental Research laboratory<br />

University of Arizona<br />

2601 E. Airport Dr.<br />

Tucson, Az 85706 USA<br />

mariohdz@email.arizona.edu<br />

The use of Biofilters to control water quality for long periods, offers the possibility of commercially producing marine organisms<br />

at inland sites, avoiding problems such as environmental contamination. Recirculating water systems require the use<br />

of a denitrification process to keep survival and ammonium and nitrate levels within acceptable ranges in order to insure the<br />

cultivated marine organism’s development. Biofilters are considered as the most important factor for water treatment in a<br />

recirculating system; their purpose is to provide a substrate to let probiotic bacteria grow. The development of such biofilters<br />

has focused on effectiveness and conserving a proper balance between ammonia production and removal. Six different biofiltration<br />

treatments were used in this study. The two way analysis of variance shows significant differences in survival of shrimp.<br />

The physical – chemical parameters such as: pH, N-NO 2 y N-NO 3 , were similar in all treatments (p > 0.05); but the DO, TAN,<br />

N-NH 3 and CaCO 3 were statistically different (p < 0.05). The two best biofilter systems with regard to shrimp survival and<br />

growth, present an opportunity to culture shrimp for long periods with cero water exchange<br />

.<br />

Treatments<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 p<br />

Temp ( 0 C) 26.7 ± 0.66 26.7 ± 0.66 26.7 ± 0.66 26.7 ± 0.66 26.7 ± 0.66 26.7 ± 0.66 p > 0.05<br />

DO (mg/L) 5.08 ± 0.31 5.05 ± 0.54 4.97 ± 0.37 4.75 ± 0.33 4.40 ± 0.49 4.50 ± 0.37 p < 0.05<br />

pH 7.70 ± 0.11 7.70 ± 0.11 7.70 ± 0.11 7.72 ± 0.10 7.62 ± 0.16 7.68 ± 0.13 p > 0.05<br />

TAN (mg/L) 0.125 ± 0.027 0.122 ± 0.045 0.100 ± 0.077 0.142 ± 0.097 0.063 ± 0.022 0.075 ± 0.042 p < 0.05<br />

N-NH3 (mg/L) 0.0038 ±0.0017 0.0033 ±0.00<strong>15</strong> 0.0028 ±0.0022 0.0042 ±0.0029 0.00<strong>15</strong> ±0.0006 0.00<strong>18</strong> ±0.0012 p < 0.05<br />

N-NO2 (mg/L) 0.375 ± 0.<strong>15</strong>4 0.492 ± 0.246 0.300 ± 0.089 0.467 ± 0.266 0.292 ± 0.<strong>15</strong>6 0.283 ± 0.264 p > 0.05<br />

N-NO3 (mg/L) 7.3 ± 2.3 8.2 ± 2.2 7.7 ± 2.7 8.7 ± 2.1 8.8 ± 2.0 9.0 ± 2.4 p > 0.05<br />

CaCO3 (mg/L) 248.7 ± 12.6 236.7 ± 26.3 219.0 ± <strong>18</strong>.7 221.3 ± 19.5 192.7 ± 37.2 198.3 ± 31.4 p < 0.05<br />

Salinity (ppt) <strong>15</strong> ± 0 <strong>15</strong> ± 0 <strong>15</strong> ± 0 <strong>15</strong> ± 0 <strong>15</strong> ± 0 <strong>15</strong> ± 0 p > 0.05<br />

Table 1.- Mean and standar deviation of the evaluated parameters during the experiment.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!