24.07.2013 Views

February 15-18, 2009 Washington State Convention Center Seattle ...

February 15-18, 2009 Washington State Convention Center Seattle ...

February 15-18, 2009 Washington State Convention Center Seattle ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EVALUATION OF MULTIPLE-BATCH CHANNEL CATFISH Ictalurus punctatus<br />

PRODUCTION FED FOUR RECENTLY-DEVELOPED COMMERCIAL DIETS<br />

Neil Pugliese, David Heikes, Carole Engle and Brian Bosworth<br />

Aquaculture/Fisheries <strong>Center</strong><br />

University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff<br />

1200 N. University Dr.<br />

Pine Bluff, AR 71601 USA<br />

With prices for channel catfish feed soaring, feed mills have adopted new feed formulations in an attempt to lower feed costs.<br />

This study compared survival, growth, FCR and net yield of four recently developed commercially available channel catfish<br />

diets in a multiple-batch production scenario. On 8 May 2008, sixteen 0.1-ha ponds were stocked with 14,388 fingerlings/ha<br />

(12.5 cm) and 4,308 head/ha (350 g) of carryover fish. The feeds used in this study were: 1) 32% corn gluten feed, 2) 32%<br />

premium feed, 3) 32% standard feed, and 4) 24% premium feed. Each of the feed treatments was assigned randomly to four<br />

ponds. The effect of the various feeds on processing parameters such as the headed-gutted weight, untrimmed fillet weight,<br />

shank fillet weight, nugget weight, visceral fat content, and the fillet fat content were also compared.<br />

At harvest (23-26 September 2008), the net yield of carryover fish fed varied significantly with the diet fed. The 32% premium<br />

diet had 3<strong>18</strong> kg/ha greater yield than the 32% standard diet that had 191 kg/ha greater yield than the 32% corn gluten diet that<br />

had 373 kg/ha greater yield than the 24% premium diet. The 32% premium and 32% standard feed treatments had similar<br />

FCR’s that were significantly lower than the FCR’s of the 32% corn gluten feed and the 24% premium feed. There was no<br />

difference in shank fillet yield among treatments but the catfish fed 32% corn gluten feed had significantly less visceral fat. A<br />

partial budget analysis compared switching to the 32% standard or 32% corn gluten feed from 32% premium. The higher yield<br />

from 32% premium feed more than offset its higher cost. It was more profitable to feed the more expensive 32% premium<br />

feed.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!