24.07.2013 Views

February 15-18, 2009 Washington State Convention Center Seattle ...

February 15-18, 2009 Washington State Convention Center Seattle ...

February 15-18, 2009 Washington State Convention Center Seattle ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

324<br />

THE CASE FOR MARINE FINFISH AQUACULTURE IN ALASKA<br />

Scott Smiley<br />

University of Alaska Fish Tech <strong>Center</strong><br />

1<strong>18</strong> Trident Way<br />

Kodiak AK 996<strong>15</strong> USA<br />

smiley@sfos.uaf.edu<br />

NOAA Fisheries presented their plan for the development of offshore finfish aquaculture in Alaska. They chose Pacific halibut<br />

(Hippoglossus stenolepis) and sablefish or black cod (Anoplopoma fimbria) as models. These species are currently harvested<br />

in Alaska under IFQ permits that are traded and have a considerable value that fluctuates in the market place. Unfortunately for<br />

NOAA Fisheries, many Alaskans had purchased IFQs, some using their life savings. The notion that the Government would<br />

assist in building an off shore aquaculture business to raise halibut and black cod was perceived as a financial threat to these<br />

fishermen. Shortly afterwards the Alaska <strong>State</strong> Legislature outlawed marine finfish aquaculture in Alaskan state waters, out to<br />

3 miles. Subsequently the Alaskan Congressional delegation made it clear that participation in NOAA fisheries plan to develop<br />

a marine aquaculture industry in Alaska’s US federal waters (3 to 200 miles off shore) would require permission of the state.<br />

Aside from the perceived threat to their financial well-being, Alaskan harvesters have seen the consequences of competition<br />

with a marine aquaculture system in salmon. Once Alaska was world leader in the salmon industry, but over the past 25 years,<br />

competition from pen reared salmon has changed the market opportunities for Alaska’s wild fish. Atlantic (Salmo salar) and<br />

coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) have become the price leaders in many US retail outlets and farmed salmon define high<br />

quality. This has alienated many Alaskan salmon fishing families who do not entertain the idea of marine finfish aquaculture<br />

in Alaska.<br />

Yet, Alaska has allowed and practiced salmon aquaculture though its hatchery system for more than 30 years. Employing what<br />

is termed Ocean Ranching, these hatcheries account for roughly a third of all the salmon harvested in Alaska. In 2007, more<br />

than 212 million salmon were harvested and more than 77 million, or 36% were derived from Private-Non-Profit (PNP), state<br />

and federal hatcheries, which took from the common property fishery 19 million fish for their cost recovery. The hatcheries collect<br />

gametes, fertilize the eggs, incubate embryos, feed hatchlings and after imprinting them, release smolt into oceanic waters<br />

to return with wild conspecifics. The PNP hatcheries cover their expenses through cost-recovery harvests. This talk will focus<br />

on the advantages and disadvantages of expanding aquaculture of marine finfish in Alaska.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!