24.07.2013 Views

February 15-18, 2009 Washington State Convention Center Seattle ...

February 15-18, 2009 Washington State Convention Center Seattle ...

February 15-18, 2009 Washington State Convention Center Seattle ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EFFECTS OF LOADING DENSITY ON GOLDEN SHINER SURVIVAL<br />

Philip Pearson*, Brian Small, Rachel Beecham, Todd Sink, Susan LaBarre and Doug Minchew<br />

USDA-Agricultural Research Service<br />

H.K. Dupree Stuttgart National Aquaculture Research <strong>Center</strong><br />

P.O. Box 1050<br />

Stuttgart, Arkansas 72160 USA<br />

philip.pearson@ars.usda.gov<br />

We conducted four hauling trips of 6 h each to investigate effects of loading density (120, <strong>18</strong>0, and 240 g fish/L) on survival of<br />

golden shiners Notemigonus crysoleucas. Commercially graded golden shiners (mean weight 3.3 g ± 0.04 SE) were transported<br />

in insulated hauling tanks filled with fresh well water, chilled with unchlorinated block ice, and aerated with pure oxygen.<br />

Whole-body cortisol analyses were not statistically different for golden shiners transported at 120, <strong>18</strong>0, or 240 g fish/L. Unionized<br />

ammonia concentration increased with respect to loading density, but had no apparent effect on survival. Results of this<br />

study indicate golden shiners can be successfully (≥ 99 % survival) transported for up to 6 h at 240 g fish/L in well water chilled<br />

with unchlorinated block ice and aerated with pure oxygen.<br />

Table 1. Mean (± SE) hauling survival, survival of 1 kg of fish transferred to tanks and held for <strong>18</strong> h after<br />

hauling, whole body cortisol, total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), and un-ionized ammonia (UIA) of golden<br />

shiners before and after hauling at three loading densities. Different letters within a column indicate<br />

treatment means that were significantly different (P ≤ 0.0001)<br />

Treatment N Survival Survival Cortisol TAN<br />

UIA<br />

(end of<br />

trip)<br />

(<strong>18</strong> h post delivery)<br />

(ng/g)<br />

Before Hauling 4 N/A N/A <strong>15</strong>.7 ±<br />

120 g of fish/L 8 99.5 ± 0.1 99.9 ± 0.1 <strong>15</strong>.0 ±<br />

<strong>18</strong>0 g of fish/L<br />

7*<br />

1.6<br />

1.3<br />

99.5 ± 0.1 99.9 ± 0.02 17.5 ±<br />

240 g of fish/L 8 99.4 ± 0.1 99.9 ± 0.02 19.9 ±<br />

2.3<br />

2.1<br />

(mg/L)<br />

(mg/L)<br />

1.68 ± 0.20 z 0.06 ± 0.01 z<br />

5.64 ± 0.30 y 0.10 ± 0.02 y<br />

8.93 ± 0.20 x 0.13 ± 0.01 x<br />

10.66 ± 0.04<br />

w<br />

0.20 ± 0.04<br />

ANOVA P = 0.51 P = 0.46 P = 0.27 P < 0.0001 P < 0.0001<br />

*On day 1 (May 29), one replicate of the <strong>18</strong>0 g/L treatment had 32% mortality due to a low dissolved<br />

oxygen concentration (0.4 mg/L) attributed to equipment failure. This replicate was not included in the<br />

statistical analysis.<br />

w<br />

395

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!